Page 2 of 3

Re: McFarland and Petrie Q&A

Posted: Sat Mar 16, 2019 11:00 am
by Dave
Petrie out

Re: McFarland and Petrie Q&A

Posted: Sat Mar 16, 2019 8:58 pm
by nonplussed
Dave wrote:Petrie out
According to my missus he's quite the dish

Sent from my EML-L09 using Tapatalk

Re: McFarland and Petrie Q&A

Posted: Sat Mar 16, 2019 9:10 pm
by big mervyn
nonplussed wrote:
Dave wrote:Petrie out
According to my missus he's quite the dish

Sent from my EML-L09 using Tapatalk
Cultured >EW

Re: McFarland and Petrie Q&A

Posted: Sat Mar 16, 2019 9:17 pm
by nonplussed
big mervyn wrote:
nonplussed wrote:
Dave wrote:Petrie out
According to my missus he's quite the dish

Sent from my EML-L09 using Tapatalk
Cultured >EW
[emoji119]

Sent from my EML-L09 using Tapatalk

Re: McFarland and Petrie Q&A

Posted: Sun Mar 17, 2019 12:24 am
by Joe Schmo
nonplussed wrote:FFS will yis give over about PJ and SO, it's a shame they aren't here but they aren't and won't be... Move the flock on.

Sent from my EML-L09 using Tapatalk
FÜCK OFF GIMP.

Re: McFarland and Petrie Q&A

Posted: Sun Mar 17, 2019 2:18 am
by Dave
Well said Joe.

Never.

Moving.

On.

Re: McFarland and Petrie Q&A

Posted: Sun Mar 17, 2019 2:33 pm
by nonplussed
Your loss lads... Life's short ... the boys have moved on. Best to follow their lead

Sent from my EML-L09 using Tapatalk

Re: McFarland and Petrie Q&A

Posted: Sun Mar 17, 2019 2:55 pm
by Dave
How about no? What happened to our boys was wrong. It will never stop being wrong.

I will never accept the outcome and therefore never move on.

FIRFUC

Re: McFarland and Petrie Q&A

Posted: Mon Mar 18, 2019 11:32 am
by rumncoke
The original mistake with PJ and Olding was to suspend them before they were charged and tried and while the case was being investigated ??? and a case made to save the lying sluts family's face.

Re: McFarland and Petrie Q&A

Posted: Mon Mar 18, 2019 12:49 pm
by therealspratt
rumncoke wrote:The original mistake with PJ and Olding was to suspend them before they were charged and tried and while the case was being investigated ??? and a case made to save the lying sluts family's face.
Should be ashamed of yourself Rum.

Re: McFarland and Petrie Q&A

Posted: Mon Mar 18, 2019 2:10 pm
by Dave
He should be but he won't.

Mods???

Re: McFarland and Petrie Q&A

Posted: Mon Mar 18, 2019 4:43 pm
by 10 or 15 only
Rumn, I wonder if the apostrophe should be before the "s" in sluts and not in the position you have put it ie in family's.
Just saying like!! :lol: :lol:

Re: McFarland and Petrie Q&A

Posted: Mon Mar 18, 2019 5:00 pm
by big mervyn
10 or 15 only wrote:Rumn, I wonder if the apostrophe should be before the "s" in sluts and not in the position you have put it ie in family's.
Just saying like!! :lol: :lol:
… unless Sluts is the family name, in which case, the lack of capitalization is somewhat amiss :lol:

Re: McFarland and Petrie Q&A

Posted: Tue Mar 19, 2019 12:06 am
by rumncoke
I am aware that members of the legal profession knew that the daughter of a member of their profession was involved before the trial but her identity was not undisclosed by them — hence the” attempted face saving trial “
.

Why do I say the suspension was a mistake it left the IRFU no fall back action they could take after the trial should they consider there had been inappropriate behaviour — eg excessive drinking etc disclosed by the trial . The players had been suspended even before charged .

Whereas a certain guilty football
who identifies an underaged girl

on the internet is reported to be now back at training .

And was playing right up to the trial .

The actions of the IRFU where excessive because they had left themselves no other action they could take .






Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Re: McFarland and Petrie Q&A

Posted: Tue Mar 19, 2019 12:29 pm
by Rooster
She was not the daughter of someone in legal profession Rummy, that's fact not fiction like so many things that were said.