Page 1 of 1

Men’s Next Senior National Representative Teams

Posted: Thu Feb 23, 2017 9:40 pm
by UlsterNo9
Men’s Next Senior National Representative Teams

http://pulse-static-files.s3.amazonaws. ... am2013.pdf

Argentina - Jaguars
Australia - Australia 'A'
Canada - Canada 'A'
England - Englands Saxons
Fiji - Fiji A
France - France U20
Ireland - Irish Wolfhounds ("Wolfhounds")
Italy - Italia Emergenti
Japan - Junior Japan
New Zealand - Junior All Blacks
Romania - Bucharest Wolves
Samoa - Samoa 'A'
Scotland - Scotland 'A'
South Africa - South Africa U20
Tonga - Tonga 'A'
USA - USA Select
Wales - Wales U20

Found this on the world rugby website, hadn't seen this about before.

So to still be illegible under 3 year rule you cannot have represented any of these teams against any of the other teams listed.

Am I right?

Re: Men’s Next Senior National Representative Teams

Posted: Thu Feb 23, 2017 10:31 pm
by damianmcr
Yes you are

Re: Men’s Next Senior National Representative Teams

Posted: Thu Feb 23, 2017 11:03 pm
by UlsterNo9
damianmcr wrote:Yes you are
No I'm not..... had forgotten about representing a country at international 7s level :thumleft:

What confuses me is Jaguars and Bucharest Wolves being nominated representative teams :scratch:

Re: Men’s Next Senior National Representative Teams

Posted: Thu Feb 23, 2017 11:04 pm
by Jackie Brown
No, Wolfhounds defunct

Ireland - Leinster

Sent from my Nexus 6P using Tapatalk

Re: Men’s Next Senior National Representative Teams

Posted: Thu Feb 23, 2017 11:21 pm
by BR
UlsterNo9 wrote:Men’s Next Senior National Representative Teams

http://pulse-static-files.s3.amazonaws. ... am2013.pdf

Argentina - Jaguars
Australia - Australia 'A'
Canada - Canada 'A'
England - Englands Saxons
Fiji - Fiji A
France - France U20
Ireland - Irish Wolfhounds ("Wolfhounds")
Italy - Italia Emergenti
Japan - Junior Japan
New Zealand - Junior All Blacks
Romania - Bucharest Wolves
Samoa - Samoa 'A'
Scotland - Scotland 'A'
South Africa - South Africa U20
Tonga - Tonga 'A'
USA - USA Select
Wales - Wales U20

Found this on the world rugby website, hadn't seen this about before.

So to still be illegible under 3 year rule you cannot have represented any of these teams against any of the other teams listed.

Am I right?
Yes, but there are other things that will tie you too. Playing for an A team against a test team, or as part of a designated tour. 7s as you say ...

Also remember that the list changes. I think there is an older version available on the IRB site too.

Re: Men’s Next Senior National Representative Teams

Posted: Thu Feb 23, 2017 11:50 pm
by Russ
UlsterNo9 wrote:
damianmcr wrote:Yes you are
No I'm not..... had forgotten about representing a country at international 7s level :thumleft:

What confuses me is Jaguars and Bucharest Wolves being nominated representative teams :scratch:
I believe the Jaguars and the Jaguares may be different sides

Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk

Re: Men’s Next Senior National Representative Teams

Posted: Thu Feb 23, 2017 11:58 pm
by Neill_M
Jaguars just a fancy name for Argentina A...not the S18 side.

The 20s one is a minefield, whether both sides are using the 20s as their 2nd side etc.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Re: Men’s Next Senior National Representative Teams

Posted: Fri Feb 24, 2017 12:36 am
by BR
Jaguars are 2 different teams in the different context. Same as the wolfhounds to a degree.

Re: Men’s Next Senior National Representative Teams

Posted: Fri Feb 24, 2017 12:47 am
by Deraless
Wolfhounds have no matches this year. For the last 5 years they've played Saxons and that's been it.

Re: Men’s Next Senior National Representative Teams

Posted: Fri Feb 24, 2017 4:53 am
by Dave
Think of all the wolfhounds caps Roger Wilson has been denied.

Re: Men’s Next Senior National Representative Teams

Posted: Fri Feb 24, 2017 5:38 pm
by UlsterNo9
Deraless wrote:Wolfhounds have no matches this year. For the last 5 years they've played Saxons and that's been it.
So from a protectionism point of view the IRFU will of course enlisted our U20 as our 2nd team :duck:

Re: Men’s Next Senior National Representative Teams

Posted: Fri Feb 24, 2017 5:49 pm
by Russ
UlsterNo9 wrote:
Deraless wrote:Wolfhounds have no matches this year. For the last 5 years they've played Saxons and that's been it.
So from a protectionism point of view the IRFU will of course enlisted our U20 as our 2nd team :duck:
Leinster U20s should suffice

Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk

Re: Men’s Next Senior National Representative Teams

Posted: Fri Feb 24, 2017 6:00 pm
by Deraless
From a protectionism point of view it makes more sense for any country to nominate an underage team. Way more players get U20 caps than even if the As played a full fixture list. Considering the As would also contain all the fringe Ulster guys who were already capped against East Timor anyway.

Re: Men’s Next Senior National Representative Teams

Posted: Sat Feb 25, 2017 10:57 am
by BR
Deraless wrote:From a protectionism point of view it makes more sense for any country to nominate an underage team. Way more players get U20 caps than even if the As played a full fixture list. Considering the As would also contain all the fringe Ulster guys who were already capped against East Timor anyway.
It depends how many other sides are doing it. Personally, I'd like to see a clause which excludes U20 caps which occur in defined U20 competitions.

Re: Men’s Next Senior National Representative Teams

Posted: Sun Feb 26, 2017 6:20 pm
by jackthelad
UlsterNo9 wrote:Men’s Next Senior National Representative Teams

http://pulse-static-files.s3.amazonaws. ... am2013.pdf

Argentina - Jaguars
Australia - Australia 'A'
Canada - Canada 'A'
England - Englands Saxons
Fiji - Fiji A
France - France U20
Ireland - Irish Wolfhounds ("Wolfhounds")
Italy - Italia Emergenti
Japan - Junior Japan
New Zealand - Junior All Blacks
Romania - Bucharest Wolves
Samoa - Samoa 'A'
Scotland - Scotland 'A'
South Africa - South Africa U20
Tonga - Tonga 'A'
USA - USA Select
Wales - Wales U20

Found this on the world rugby website, hadn't seen this about before.

So to still be illegible under 3 year rule you cannot have represented any of these teams against any of the other teams listed.

Am I right?
No. It means it's written in invisible ink.