Re: Autumn Internationals - TV coverage?
Posted: Sat Nov 25, 2017 5:48 pm
Not sure Scotland were that convincing. 15 v 15 would have been a very different game imho
The Ulternative Alster Fan Club supporting Ulster Rugby!
https://www.uafc.co.uk/
i missed the red card, was it the correct decision?BR wrote:Not sure Scotland were that convincing. 15 v 15 would have been a very different game imho
Convincing on the scoreboard.BR wrote:Not sure Scotland were that convincing. 15 v 15 would have been a very different game imho
Seemed clearcut at the time. I think the ref only reviewed it looking for mitigation.Joe Schmo wrote:i missed the red card, was it the correct decision?BR wrote:Not sure Scotland were that convincing. 15 v 15 would have been a very different game imho
Well RTE seem convinced you boys are watching, every time they have a competition for222toHounslow wrote:The fact that the FIRFU sold the rights knowing full well Nordie supporters had no access to a free to air option pretty much sums up what they think of us.
RTE player definitely doesnt work with a BT postcodeconnachtfan wrote:Well RTE seem convinced you boys are watching, every time they have a competition for222toHounslow wrote:The fact that the FIRFU sold the rights knowing full well Nordie supporters had no access to a free to air option pretty much sums up what they think of us.
future fixture tickets they give viewers from NI a number to call. Maybe some distinguished gentlemen on here just aren't that tech saavy?
It's not about tech savvy. Most of us *could* receive an RTE2 signal; the question becomes - is it worth the outlay in varying ones standard tech set up in order to watch 3 matches/year?connachtfan wrote:Well RTE seem convinced you boys are watching, every time they have a competition for222toHounslow wrote:The fact that the FIRFU sold the rights knowing full well Nordie supporters had no access to a free to air option pretty much sums up what they think of us.
future fixture tickets they give viewers from NI a number to call. Maybe some distinguished gentlemen on here just aren't that tech saavy?
So there is access and it is really a question of choice. No issue therefore.BR wrote: It's not about tech savvy. Most of us *could* receive an RTE2 signal; the question becomes - is it worth the outlay in varying ones standard tech set up in order to watch 3 matches/year?
Well we could all just subscribe to sky sports too. That would be the cheaper option for many. (Or go to the pub ...)Shan wrote:So there is access and it is really a question of choice. No issue therefore.BR wrote: It's not about tech savvy. Most of us *could* receive an RTE2 signal; the question becomes - is it worth the outlay in varying ones standard tech set up in order to watch 3 matches/year?
Or just say FU IRFUBR wrote:Well we could all just subscribe to sky sports too. That would be the cheaper option for many. (Or go to the pub ...)Shan wrote:So there is access and it is really a question of choice. No issue therefore.BR wrote: It's not about tech savvy. Most of us *could* receive an RTE2 signal; the question becomes - is it worth the outlay in varying ones standard tech set up in order to watch 3 matches/year?
Indeed. We have lots of options. We are pretty lucky really.BR wrote: Well we could all just subscribe to sky sports too. That would be the cheaper option for many. (Or go to the pub ...)
Yeah why not. Shur yiz have plenty of practice by now with that one.Rooster wrote:Or just say FU IRFU