# MeToo
Moderator: Moderators
Re: # MeToo
Brett Kavanaaaaaaaaawww fanboys are fecking everywhere.
I have my own tv channel, what have you got?
Re: # MeToo
I suppose not wanting Paddy Jackson to have been hounded out of Ulster makes one a Paddy Jackson fanboy then?Dave wrote:Brett Kavanaaaaaaaaawww fanboys are fecking everywhere.
Yes, that's me in the avatar!
Re: # MeToo
DO NOT MENTION PADDY JACKSON IN THIS THREAD.WeeWorld wrote:I suppose not wanting Paddy Jackson to have been hounded out of Ulster makes one a Paddy Jackson fanboy then?Dave wrote:Brett Kavanaaaaaaaaawww fanboys are fecking everywhere.
Slide off to some Brett Kavanaugh forum. No one cares.
I have my own tv channel, what have you got?
Re: # MeToo
faux outrage, real credible daveDave wrote:DO NOT MENTION PADDY JACKSON IN THIS THREAD.WeeWorld wrote:I suppose not wanting Paddy Jackson to have been hounded out of Ulster makes one a Paddy Jackson fanboy then?Dave wrote:Brett Kavanaaaaaaaaawww fanboys are fecking everywhere.
Slide off to some Brett Kavanaugh forum. No one cares.
Yes, that's me in the avatar!
Re: # MeToo
Right.WeeWorld wrote:
faux outrage, real credible dave
I have my own tv channel, what have you got?
Re: # MeToo
Unbelievable. Any other Brett fanboys think this shyte is comparable to what happened to our boys? Who fcuking cares what happens in Murica? Leave our boys out of it.
I think I need more landmines.
I think I need more landmines.
I have my own tv channel, what have you got?
- Russ
- Rí na Cúige Uladh
- Posts: 28295
- Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2012 2:27 pm
- Location: Looking for George North's defence
Re: # MeToo
Imagine how good an investigation the FBI could have done if this was reported properly to them instead of to CNN and the Democrat Party
Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
-
- Chancellor to the King
- Posts: 3092
- Joined: Fri Oct 07, 2016 10:03 pm
Re: # MeToo
You would imagine the basis of any investigation would be to speak to the complainant. Not for the FBI it appears.
Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk
Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk
- Russ
- Rí na Cúige Uladh
- Posts: 28295
- Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2012 2:27 pm
- Location: Looking for George North's defence
Re: # MeToo
Maybe if the complainant actually went to the police rather than to CNN and the Democratsjean valjean wrote:You would imagine the basis of any investigation would be to speak to the complainant. Not for the FBI it appears.
Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk
Let's face it, the Democrats didn't give a feck about her sexual assault. They only wanted to use her for the political aims
Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
-
- Warrior Chief
- Posts: 1654
- Joined: Thu Dec 13, 2012 7:05 pm
Re: # MeToo
It's not really that important what he did or didn't do 30 years ago. The fact that a man who is seeking office as one of the 9 people charged with protecting the integrity of law in the usa has lied under oath to the group charged with confirming his appointment has demonstrated he is not fit to hold that office.WeeWorld wrote:You were on here bragging about how drunk you (a pensioner) were last Saturday and now you're calling Brett Kavanaugh, "drunken Brett" because he drank beer as a teenager, 30 years ago.
Paul.
C'mon Ulsterrrrrrrrr!
C'mon Ulsterrrrrrrrr!
Re: # MeToo
Firsly that's not been proved.pwrmoore wrote:It's not really that important what he did or didn't do 30 years ago. The fact that a man who is seeking office as one of the 9 people charged with protecting the integrity of law in the usa has lied under oath to the group charged with confirming his appointment has demonstrated he is not fit to hold that office.WeeWorld wrote:You were on here bragging about how drunk you (a pensioner) were last Saturday and now you're calling Brett Kavanaugh, "drunken Brett" because he drank beer as a teenager, 30 years ago.
Secondly unless you're the Virgin Mary there's something in everyone's past life that can be held up as demonstrating that one is not fit for Office.
But suppose he did lie about his drinking, I don't care. He was a very young man at the time.
I'd go so far as to say that the sort of people who could truthfully pass one of these inquisitions about their personal lives are probably the last people you'd want in your supreme court.
Yes, that's me in the avatar!
Re: # MeToo
Indeed I think the world would be a far better place if we had a rule that only virgins who are also named Mary are allowed to hold public office. Even if someone was named Maria I would advise that they should only be allowed to act in an advisory role.WeeWorld wrote: Secondly unless you're the Virgin Mary there's something in everyone's past life that can be held up as demonstrating that one is not fit for Office.
I suspect we'd see the transgender numbers rise significantly once this rule was established.
I wonder if Mary down the road who has a child but claims to be a virgin would be accepted.
It is a man's own mind, not his enemy or foe, that lures him to evil ways.
Re: # MeToo
pwrmoore wrote:
It's not really that important what he did or didn't do 30 years ago. The fact that a man who is seeking office as one of the 9 people charged with protecting the integrity of law in the usa has lied under oath to the group charged with confirming his appointment has demonstrated he is not fit to hold that office.
If there is proof of that lying under oath then it would be ridiculous to disagree with you.
It is a man's own mind, not his enemy or foe, that lures him to evil ways.
Re: # MeToo
He can demonstrably shown to have lied in his answers to the committee investigating his appointment and not just about his drinking. Just read the transcripts, look at the evidence he provided, and check the maps of the area and you can see that.WeeWorld wrote:Firsly that's not been proved.pwrmoore wrote:It's not really that important what he did or didn't do 30 years ago. The fact that a man who is seeking office as one of the 9 people charged with protecting the integrity of law in the usa has lied under oath to the group charged with confirming his appointment has demonstrated he is not fit to hold that office.WeeWorld wrote:You were on here bragging about how drunk you (a pensioner) were last Saturday and now you're calling Brett Kavanaugh, "drunken Brett" because he drank beer as a teenager, 30 years ago.
Secondly unless you're the Virgin Mary there's something in everyone's past life that can be held up as demonstrating that one is not fit for Office.
But suppose he did lie about his drinking, I don't care. He was a very young man at the time.
I'd go so far as to say that the sort of people who could truthfully pass one of these inquisitions about their personal lives are probably the last people you'd want in your supreme court.
One good such analysis can be found here
https://www.currentaffairs.org/2018/09/ ... h-is-lying
Or the Washington post
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics ... 7d07de8f30
or the Chicago tribune
http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/opin ... story.html
Your second point is entirely irrelevant. I've conceded that is doesn't particularly matter whether he is guilty of underage drinking, boisterous laddish behavior or potentially even attempted rape. You are right there is probably no one in the world who hasn't done something stupid in the past - that is entirely beside the point.
What you seem to fail to acknowledge is that the lynchpin of western legal systems is the duty of everyone to answer honestly under oath. As a judge he should recognize that and value that and he should realise that he cannot be seen to be above that. Instead he shows contempt for the office he wishes to hold.
Paul.
C'mon Ulsterrrrrrrrr!
C'mon Ulsterrrrrrrrr!