PADDY JACKSON

Join in the craic, and support yer team here!

Moderator: Moderators

Post Reply
TMHG
Initiate
Posts: 397
Joined: Fri Jan 26, 2007 3:10 pm
Location: Dublin

Re: PADDY JACKSON

Post by TMHG »

twiglet wrote:I don't know how folk know where the feminazis are from but a few of the posters reckon a number of them are from the south. If so, why are they so bothered about Paddy and where he plays?
A few years ago Ismaheel Akinade was one of three who raped a 14 year old girl a number of times. He was eventually found GUILTY but continued to play football for Waterford in the league of Ireland. The feminine network were nowhere to be seen. Why? Would it be because of his colour, or maybe his religion or maybe because Ismaheel was not a rugby player?
Significant differences between the cases. First of all, they were all underage (Akinade was 16 at the time). In the ROI, details of a case will not be published unless the victim agrees to it (to protect the identity of the victim). Akinade was convicted of sexual abuse but did show remorse, unlike PJ who came out with all guns blazing! He did get a suspended sentence (presumably because of his age and the time it took to get to court (4 years).

As far as I can recall, a Dundalk United footballer was suspended for tweeting support for the lads when the court case ended and a Laois Gaelic Footballer was dropped for a final when doing something similar on twitter (despite being the leading points scorer in the league).
User avatar
Dave
Rí­ na Cúige Uladh
Posts: 24532
Joined: Fri Apr 08, 2011 4:27 pm

Re: PADDY JACKSON

Post by Dave »

TMHG wrote:
twiglet wrote:I don't know how folk know where the feminazis are from but a few of the posters reckon a number of them are from the south. If so, why are they so bothered about Paddy and where he plays?
A few years ago Ismaheel Akinade was one of three who raped a 14 year old girl a number of times. He was eventually found GUILTY but continued to play football for Waterford in the league of Ireland. The feminine network were nowhere to be seen. Why? Would it be because of his colour, or maybe his religion or maybe because Ismaheel was not a rugby player?
Significant differences between the cases. First of all, they were all underage (Akinade was 16 at the time). In the ROI, details of a case will not be published unless the victim agrees to it (to protect the identity of the victim). Akinade was convicted of sexual abuse but did show remorse, unlike PJ who came out with all guns blazing! He did get a suspended sentence (presumably because of his age and the time it took to get to court (4 years).

As far as I can recall, a Dundalk United footballer was suspended for tweeting support for the lads when the court case ended and a Laois Gaelic Footballer was dropped for a final when doing something similar on twitter (despite being the leading points scorer in the league).
So Akinade is grand because he showed remorse for a sexual abuse conviction but somehow Paddy Jackson, convicted of NOTHING, gets your criticism.

This is mind bending logic.
I have my own tv channel, what have you got?
222toHounslow
Warrior Chief
Posts: 1654
Joined: Thu Dec 13, 2012 7:05 pm

Re: PADDY JACKSON

Post by 222toHounslow »

Logic was left behind a long time ago buddy.
NUCIFORA IS A BELLEND
User avatar
UlsterNo9
Lord Chancellor
Posts: 5708
Joined: Wed Oct 10, 2012 10:02 pm

Re: PADDY JACKSON

Post by UlsterNo9 »

TMHG wrote:
Significant differences between the cases. First of all, they were all underage (Akinade was 16 at the time). In the ROI, details of a case will not be published unless the victim agrees to it (to protect the identity of the victim). Akinade was convicted of sexual abuse but did show remorse, unlike PJ who came out with all guns blazing! He did get a suspended sentence (presumably because of his age and the time it took to get to court (4 years).

As far as I can recall, a Dundalk United footballer was suspended for tweeting support for the lads when the court case ended and a Laois Gaelic Footballer was dropped for a final when doing something similar on twitter (despite being the leading points scorer in the league).
The mind boggles.

Akinade = Convicted = Shows Remorse = Okay
Jackson = Not convicted = Shows no remorse = Not okay

So it's better to be guilty and show remorse than have committed no crime but not be remorseful for being acquitted :lol:

Good grief!
BRING OUR BOYS HOME #BOBH
THROWN UNDER THE BUS AND EXILED 14/04/18
TMHG
Initiate
Posts: 397
Joined: Fri Jan 26, 2007 3:10 pm
Location: Dublin

Re: PADDY JACKSON

Post by TMHG »

Dave wrote:
TMHG wrote:
twiglet wrote:I don't know how folk know where the feminazis are from but a few of the posters reckon a number of them are from the south. If so, why are they so bothered about Paddy and where he plays?
A few years ago Ismaheel Akinade was one of three who raped a 14 year old girl a number of times. He was eventually found GUILTY but continued to play football for Waterford in the league of Ireland. The feminine network were nowhere to be seen. Why? Would it be because of his colour, or maybe his religion or maybe because Ismaheel was not a rugby player?
Significant differences between the cases. First of all, they were all underage (Akinade was 16 at the time). In the ROI, details of a case will not be published unless the victim agrees to it (to protect the identity of the victim). Akinade was convicted of sexual abuse but did show remorse, unlike PJ who came out with all guns blazing! He did get a suspended sentence (presumably because of his age and the time it took to get to court (4 years).

As far as I can recall, a Dundalk United footballer was suspended for tweeting support for the lads when the court case ended and a Laois Gaelic Footballer was dropped for a final when doing something similar on twitter (despite being the leading points scorer in the league).
So Akinade is grand because he showed remorse for a sexual abuse conviction but somehow Paddy Jackson, convicted of NOTHING, gets your criticism.

This is mind bending logic.
No, Akinade isn't grand. But there is a difference in the cases and in PJ & Co. were adults. The reason presumably why the 'feminazis' were not jumping up and down about it is because all involved were children and the laws that apply in the ROI limits reporting of sexual assault cases and the public are excluded from attending the court cases.
TMHG
Initiate
Posts: 397
Joined: Fri Jan 26, 2007 3:10 pm
Location: Dublin

Re: PADDY JACKSON

Post by TMHG »

UlsterNo9 wrote:
TMHG wrote:
Significant differences between the cases. First of all, they were all underage (Akinade was 16 at the time). In the ROI, details of a case will not be published unless the victim agrees to it (to protect the identity of the victim). Akinade was convicted of sexual abuse but did show remorse, unlike PJ who came out with all guns blazing! He did get a suspended sentence (presumably because of his age and the time it took to get to court (4 years).

As far as I can recall, a Dundalk United footballer was suspended for tweeting support for the lads when the court case ended and a Laois Gaelic Footballer was dropped for a final when doing something similar on twitter (despite being the leading points scorer in the league).
The mind boggles.

Akinade = Convicted = Shows Remorse = Okay
Jackson = Not convicted = Shows no remorse = Not okay

So it's better to be guilty and show remorse than have committed no crime but not be remorseful for being acquitted :lol:

Good grief!
The problem is that they are just not role model material in their misogynistic attitude.
User avatar
Dave
Rí­ na Cúige Uladh
Posts: 24532
Joined: Fri Apr 08, 2011 4:27 pm

Re: PADDY JACKSON

Post by Dave »

TMHG wrote:
Dave wrote:
TMHG wrote:
twiglet wrote:I don't know how folk know where the feminazis are from but a few of the posters reckon a number of them are from the south. If so, why are they so bothered about Paddy and where he plays?
A few years ago Ismaheel Akinade was one of three who raped a 14 year old girl a number of times. He was eventually found GUILTY but continued to play football for Waterford in the league of Ireland. The feminine network were nowhere to be seen. Why? Would it be because of his colour, or maybe his religion or maybe because Ismaheel was not a rugby player?
Significant differences between the cases. First of all, they were all underage (Akinade was 16 at the time). In the ROI, details of a case will not be published unless the victim agrees to it (to protect the identity of the victim). Akinade was convicted of sexual abuse but did show remorse, unlike PJ who came out with all guns blazing! He did get a suspended sentence (presumably because of his age and the time it took to get to court (4 years).

As far as I can recall, a Dundalk United footballer was suspended for tweeting support for the lads when the court case ended and a Laois Gaelic Footballer was dropped for a final when doing something similar on twitter (despite being the leading points scorer in the league).
So Akinade is grand because he showed remorse for a sexual abuse conviction but somehow Paddy Jackson, convicted of NOTHING, gets your criticism.

This is mind bending logic.
No, Akinade isn't grand. But there is a difference in the cases and in PJ & Co. were adults. The reason presumably why the 'feminazis' were not jumping up and down about it is because all involved were children and the laws that apply in the ROI limits reporting of sexual assault cases and the public are excluded from attending the court cases.
Yes but you are still defending one and criticising the other. The main difference between the two cases is that in one case there was a conviction. In the other case there was an acquittal. Just let that sink in...
I have my own tv channel, what have you got?
User avatar
UlsterNo9
Lord Chancellor
Posts: 5708
Joined: Wed Oct 10, 2012 10:02 pm

Re: PADDY JACKSON

Post by UlsterNo9 »

TMHG wrote:
UlsterNo9 wrote:
TMHG wrote:
Significant differences between the cases. First of all, they were all underage (Akinade was 16 at the time). In the ROI, details of a case will not be published unless the victim agrees to it (to protect the identity of the victim). Akinade was convicted of sexual abuse but did show remorse, unlike PJ who came out with all guns blazing! He did get a suspended sentence (presumably because of his age and the time it took to get to court (4 years).

As far as I can recall, a Dundalk United footballer was suspended for tweeting support for the lads when the court case ended and a Laois Gaelic Footballer was dropped for a final when doing something similar on twitter (despite being the leading points scorer in the league).
The mind boggles.

Akinade = Convicted = Shows Remorse = Okay
Jackson = Not convicted = Shows no remorse = Not okay

So it's better to be guilty and show remorse than have committed no crime but not be remorseful for being acquitted :lol:

Good grief!
The problem is that they are just not role model material in their misogynistic attitude.
What misogynistic attitude? Apologise / show remorse for being acquitted?

Any misogynistic attitude shown, remorse has been quite clearly publicised.......

A role model for who? Kids? Where are their parents? That's who their role models should be. Parents relying on sports persons to set an example for their children are not fit to be parents in the first instance.
Last edited by UlsterNo9 on Sat May 11, 2019 3:46 pm, edited 2 times in total.
BRING OUR BOYS HOME #BOBH
THROWN UNDER THE BUS AND EXILED 14/04/18
justinr73
Lord Chancellor
Posts: 5677
Joined: Thu Aug 07, 2014 1:14 pm

Re: PADDY JACKSON

Post by justinr73 »

TMHG wrote:
UlsterNo9 wrote:
TMHG wrote:
Significant differences between the cases. First of all, they were all underage (Akinade was 16 at the time). In the ROI, details of a case will not be published unless the victim agrees to it (to protect the identity of the victim). Akinade was convicted of sexual abuse but did show remorse, unlike PJ who came out with all guns blazing! He did get a suspended sentence (presumably because of his age and the time it took to get to court (4 years).

As far as I can recall, a Dundalk United footballer was suspended for tweeting support for the lads when the court case ended and a Laois Gaelic Footballer was dropped for a final when doing something similar on twitter (despite being the leading points scorer in the league).
The mind boggles.

Akinade = Convicted = Shows Remorse = Okay
Jackson = Not convicted = Shows no remorse = Not okay

So it's better to be guilty and show remorse than have committed no crime but not be remorseful for being acquitted :lol:

Good grief!
The problem is that they are just not role model material in their misogynistic attitude.
Who said sports stars needed to be role models anyway?

And what would be the point given that 99.5 % of us would have no chance of emulating them?

Most sports stars are poorly educated, perennial adolescents who have never done a real day’s work in their lives.

And that’s actually why we like/envy them.
Last edited by justinr73 on Sat May 11, 2019 3:36 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Russ
Rí­ na Cúige Uladh
Posts: 28295
Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2012 2:27 pm
Location: Looking for George North's defence

Re: PADDY JACKSON

Post by Russ »

Facebook are now outraged by his LI salary

Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
User avatar
big mervyn
Rí­ na Cúige Uladh
Posts: 14360
Joined: Fri May 09, 2008 2:22 pm
Location: Overlooking the pitch (til they built the old new stand)

Re: PADDY JACKSON

Post by big mervyn »

Russ wrote:Facebook are now outraged by his LI salary

Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
I'm outraged that he lost everything he had plus his Da's pension pot.
What's he supposed to be on?
Volunteer at an animal sanctuary; it will fill you with joy , despair, but most of all love, unconditional love of the animals.
Big Neville Southall
User avatar
UlsterNo9
Lord Chancellor
Posts: 5708
Joined: Wed Oct 10, 2012 10:02 pm

Re: PADDY JACKSON

Post by UlsterNo9 »

big mervyn wrote:
Russ wrote:Facebook are now outraged by his LI salary

Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
I'm outraged that he lost everything he had plus his Da's pension pot.
What's he supposed to be on?
500k per season, fair fecks to him

https://www.rugbypass.com/news/paddy-ja ... -20-season

Still won't compensate the amount of money he has missed out on sponsorship deals.
BRING OUR BOYS HOME #BOBH
THROWN UNDER THE BUS AND EXILED 14/04/18
User avatar
big mervyn
Rí­ na Cúige Uladh
Posts: 14360
Joined: Fri May 09, 2008 2:22 pm
Location: Overlooking the pitch (til they built the old new stand)

Re: PADDY JACKSON

Post by big mervyn »

UlsterNo9 wrote:
big mervyn wrote:
Russ wrote:Facebook are now outraged by his LI salary

Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
I'm outraged that he lost everything he had plus his Da's pension pot.
What's he supposed to be on?
500k per season, fair fecks to him

https://www.rugbypass.com/news/paddy-ja ... -20-season

Still won't compensate the amount of money he has missed out on sponsorship deals.
… or the 22 Irish caps that wee Joey, Byrne and Carty have accumulated in his absence.
Volunteer at an animal sanctuary; it will fill you with joy , despair, but most of all love, unconditional love of the animals.
Big Neville Southall
User avatar
Jackie Brown
Rí­ na Cúige Uladh
Posts: 11723
Joined: Sat Jun 11, 2005 1:15 pm
Location: Carrickfergus

Re: PADDY JACKSON

Post by Jackie Brown »

TMHG wrote:
twiglet wrote:I don't know how folk know where the feminazis are from but a few of the posters reckon a number of them are from the south. If so, why are they so bothered about Paddy and where he plays?
A few years ago Ismaheel Akinade was one of three who raped a 14 year old girl a number of times. He was eventually found GUILTY but continued to play football for Waterford in the league of Ireland. The feminine network were nowhere to be seen. Why? Would it be because of his colour, or maybe his religion or maybe because Ismaheel was not a rugby player?
Significant differences between the cases. First of all, they were all underage (Akinade was 16 at the time). In the ROI, details of a case will not be published unless the victim agrees to it (to protect the identity of the victim). Akinade was convicted of sexual abuse but did show remorse, unlike PJ who came out with all guns blazing! He did get a suspended sentence (presumably because of his age and the time it took to get to court (4 years).

As far as I can recall, a Dundalk United footballer was suspended for tweeting support for the lads when the court case ended and a Laois Gaelic Footballer was dropped for a final when doing something similar on twitter (despite being the leading points scorer in the league).
Sounds like standard RoI bullshit. How dare Paddy come out all guns blazing when found innocent, the cheek of him. He should have videoed the encounter and sent it to his mates.

Sent from my Pixel 2 using Tapatalk
Gonna Party Like It's 1999
User avatar
Russ
Rí­ na Cúige Uladh
Posts: 28295
Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2012 2:27 pm
Location: Looking for George North's defence

Re: PADDY JACKSON

Post by Russ »

His salary won't buy him a house in SW London

Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
Post Reply