Paddy Bamford
Moderator: Moderators
- the original kimble
- Warrior Chief
- Posts: 1784
- Joined: Mon Jun 13, 2005 9:07 am
- Location: 39th step
- Contact:
Ardtostopencouragingmemichael.
I have the Grumpy's reputation to think of!
Have you raided your piggybank for all that proxy bootleg stout I promised everyone you would buy at the Rosie yamarra?
tok
Isn't thread jumping fun?
I have the Grumpy's reputation to think of!
Have you raided your piggybank for all that proxy bootleg stout I promised everyone you would buy at the Rosie yamarra?
tok
Isn't thread jumping fun?
It's more comfortable to be mad and know it, than to be sane and have one's doubts.
Anyway, the only difference between me and a madman is I’m not mad….I think…
www.ursc.co
Anyway, the only difference between me and a madman is I’m not mad….I think…
www.ursc.co
-
- Squire
- Posts: 604
- Joined: Sun Sep 10, 2006 1:15 pm
-
- Lord Chancellor
- Posts: 8248
- Joined: Sat Jun 11, 2005 11:06 am
Given the close association that some have now formed with Paddy can anyone answer whether all those that made statements regarding the incident were ever contacted? Also given that I also give permission for my statement and details to be passed on to the IP can anyone answer whether this happened?
Currently studying Stage 5 (level3) at IRFU
- the original kimble
- Warrior Chief
- Posts: 1784
- Joined: Mon Jun 13, 2005 9:07 am
- Location: 39th step
- Contact:
Hi ya Rip van Winkle,
I believe the answer is "yes".
tok
I believe the answer is "yes".
tok
It's more comfortable to be mad and know it, than to be sane and have one's doubts.
Anyway, the only difference between me and a madman is I’m not mad….I think…
www.ursc.co
Anyway, the only difference between me and a madman is I’m not mad….I think…
www.ursc.co
- the original kimble
- Warrior Chief
- Posts: 1784
- Joined: Mon Jun 13, 2005 9:07 am
- Location: 39th step
- Contact:
Oh, go back to sleep!
tok
tok
It's more comfortable to be mad and know it, than to be sane and have one's doubts.
Anyway, the only difference between me and a madman is I’m not mad….I think…
www.ursc.co
Anyway, the only difference between me and a madman is I’m not mad….I think…
www.ursc.co
-
- Lord Chancellor
- Posts: 8248
- Joined: Sat Jun 11, 2005 11:06 am
-
- Steward
- Posts: 888
- Joined: Mon Jun 13, 2005 2:43 pm
- Location: Alster Scots' Agency
- Contact:
-
- Squire
- Posts: 604
- Joined: Sun Sep 10, 2006 1:15 pm
-
- Lord Chancellor
- Posts: 8248
- Joined: Sat Jun 11, 2005 11:06 am
Alister - Informed opinion or like one previous occasion when you forgot which name you where posting under?
I for one wasn't contacted by anyone responsible for the collecting of statements despite it being delivered by hand and as yet I have not been informed that said statement has been forwarded to the IP.
So YES doesn't appear to be the right answer unless of course there is selective statement collecting whatever the reason for that might be.
I for one wasn't contacted by anyone responsible for the collecting of statements despite it being delivered by hand and as yet I have not been informed that said statement has been forwarded to the IP.
So YES doesn't appear to be the right answer unless of course there is selective statement collecting whatever the reason for that might be.
Currently studying Stage 5 (level3) at IRFU
-
- Steward
- Posts: 888
- Joined: Mon Jun 13, 2005 2:43 pm
- Location: Alster Scots' Agency
- Contact:
Cockatrice the Inquisitive
Profound apologies for not responding sooner. I dozed off and have only just noticed your latest interrogation.
My answer was neither an informed opinion nor like one previous occasion when I used a different pseudonym. It was a deduced answer in that you asked a question with only TWO possible answers, and I quote:
YES - "yes to both"
OR
YES- "yes to 1 OR 2"
Since it's "either or", one way or another, the answer's "yes"
But what was the original question?
Ali
Profound apologies for not responding sooner. I dozed off and have only just noticed your latest interrogation.
My answer was neither an informed opinion nor like one previous occasion when I used a different pseudonym. It was a deduced answer in that you asked a question with only TWO possible answers, and I quote:
My belief that the answer was "YES" was deduced on the premise that one or other was correct, ergo:Cockatrice wrote:2 questions but 1 answer. Is it Yes to both or Yes to 1 or 2.
YES - "yes to both"
OR
YES- "yes to 1 OR 2"
Since it's "either or", one way or another, the answer's "yes"
But what was the original question?
Ali
-
- Lord Chancellor
- Posts: 6191
- Joined: Tue Jun 21, 2005 4:31 pm
- Location: holywood (or glasgow)
- Contact:
Re: Paddy Bamford
Lest We Forget - and for the record I believe it's now DAY 4196, and counting ........