The UAFC

BR wrote:Read the fecking title folks. It's RW's selection from last week; not Joe Schmidt's.

You gotta admit though that it would have been less if they'd posted it (on here) before the squad was announced/leaked ..... or at least made it clear that it had been posted elsewhere before that rather than just making it look like someone had predicted (incorrectly) after the event.

just saying, like!

BR wrote:Read the fecking title folks. It's RW's selection from last week; not Joe Schmidt's.

Sharpen up BR, I would have thunk that the tone of my post hinted that the entire kit & caboodle was an irrelevance. However rather than savage the dear lady, I thought a tangent most appropriate.

I stand by my comments

Why is it deemed necessary to be excessively rude to a new poster?

Snipe Watson wrote:Why is it deemed necessary to be excessively rude to a new poster?

God knows. We used to be a broad church that welcomed anyone.

Snipe Watson wrote:Why is it deemed necessary to be excessively rude to a new poster?

I must comment that I like all new posters

I'm just a Richard

Snipe Watson wrote:Why is it deemed necessary to be excessively rude to a new poster?

It saves time later.

Snipe Watson wrote:Why is it deemed necessary to be excessively rude to a new poster?

Really, who did that?

Are you sure Ms Miller isn't yet another new name for a certain poster?

The thread appears entirely bogus to an experienced hand, why on earth would you open a speculation thread on the 31 panel when the real thing was in clear public view?

Sure you're not sleeping in on this one Sniper?

BaggyTrousers wrote:

Snipe Watson wrote:Why is it deemed necessary to be excessively rude to a new poster?

Really, who did that?

Are you sure Ms Miller isn't yet another new name for a certain poster?

The thread appears entirely bogus to an experienced hand, why on earth would you open a speculation thread on the 31 panel when the real thing was in clear public view?

Sure you're not sleeping in on this one Sniper?

I always give a lady the benefit of the doubt. I'm old school like that.
If it turns out to be thon plonker......

There are one or seven people with multiple usernames - I was once amongst these charlatans myself though no longer.

BaggyTrousers wrote:There are one or seven people with multiple usernames - I was once amongst these charlatans myself though no longer.

Indeed there are. As you know, I also dipped my toe into those murky waters, but promptly withdrew them.

Has she been back?

BaggyTrousers wrote: why on earth would you open a speculation thread on the 31 panel when the real thing was in clear public view?

Perhaps to compare and contrast the opinions of a 'reputable'* rugby publication to those of Joe Schmidt and indeed everyone else who had given an opinion of the selection.

* opinions vary.