The UAFC

Haha

Don't mind that. The ulster tops over hoodies with lanyards on full display annoys me.

How else are you meant to keep warm? ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

damianmcr wrote:How else are you meant to keep warm? ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

I would suggest, not with yer lanyard on full display!

damianmcr wrote:How else are you meant to keep warm? ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

Wear a coat.

Dave wrote:Don't mind that. The ulster tops over hoodies with lanyards on full display annoys me.

Hey, leave Russ alone.

Someone has lost their f'n dug!

Forget the dug search, I want missing Ulster line out posters hanging on every tree.

big mervyn wrote:

damianmcr wrote:How else are you meant to keep warm? ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

I would suggest, not with yer lanyard on full display!

Not guilty on Saturday, but would be on many occasions. (Lanyard on my hip though, not around my neck)

Kofi Annan wrote:What the actual fûck is this

image.jpeg

Pretty sure that is the Ravenhill Park Exit.

BaggyTrousers wrote:I still don’t get/decline to get why we have a no names policy,

Do 'we'?

Perhaps people may wish to avoid encouraging any petty retribution when admonishing some of the less stable bake book contributers and feel that leaving things anonymous may help in that regard. Fair enough - it's their call. But I am not aware if any policy we have as a community.

Mods have aiready deleted a name from an earlier post

scrum5 wrote:Mods have aiready deleted a name from an earlier post

I can see them doing that if requested by the bakebooker, or preemptively if the comments here were personally critical (what would be the chances of that?). Maybe they feel it's easier just to have a policy of anonymity. Wasn't aware of it myself.

Ah FFFS BR, would I have said it if it wasn't true. We certainly do and given the punters concerned have happily put their name to public statements, which if I understand bakebook they cannot delete, then I remain steadfastly confused as to why we have the remotest interest in them being anonymous here.

BaggyTrousers wrote:Ah FFFS BR, would I have said it if it wasn't true. We certainly do and given the punters concerned have happily put their name to public statements, which if I understand bakebook they cannot delete, then I remain steadfastly confused as to why we have the remotest interest in them being anonymous here.

From a moral point of view. We should have no problem reporting what they have said elsewhere. The problem arises where you have comments on that identified person made here on an anonymous forum.

So you have a non-anonymous person being 'helped'/ridiculed by a group of faceless keyboard warriors. Could lead to the terrible crime of internet bullying!

Replying to them on bakebook, at least a) those replying are theoretically identifiable.
b) the person has the right to reply.

Bakebook posts are deletable.