HENSON BAN A DISGRACE
Moderator: Moderators
-
- Lord Chancellor
- Posts: 4281
- Joined: Sun Aug 21, 2005 5:51 pm
- Location: Mid Down
HENSON BAN A DISGRACE
If you needed an example of inequality in application of rules this is surely it. I am no fan of this guy but we need to be just and fair. What would he have got had he been English? If he had been essential to the English team? Disgraceful and what brings the blazers into total disrepute in the sport.
-
- Lord Chancellor
- Posts: 4281
- Joined: Sun Aug 21, 2005 5:51 pm
- Location: Mid Down
Do I detect that the respondents do not agree with me? Do I detect the usual well argued response from Deadball who has singlehandedly destroyed the official site in my view with his petty and obsessive vendetta against Ballpark? Am I concerned what Deadball thinks? No.
Not sure how to evaluate the other response which implies inbuilt anti English bias which is not an example of egalitarian principles either and reinforces my point about officials bringing the game into disrepute.
I don't regard myself as corrected yet.
Happy Christmas to all our readers.
Not sure how to evaluate the other response which implies inbuilt anti English bias which is not an example of egalitarian principles either and reinforces my point about officials bringing the game into disrepute.
I don't regard myself as corrected yet.
Happy Christmas to all our readers.
- jamesie
- Lord Chancellor
- Posts: 4612
- Joined: Sat Jun 11, 2005 12:22 am
- Location: Islington London
- Contact:
dog,
don't mind saying that the dude hanson grates my nuts, but my gut feel is that... yes, it's harsh. the application of the law is all over the place at the mo so hard to look at it objectively
i do not however buy in to your points re 'quasi immunity' for english players or 'english bias' and your allegations of the 'blazers' bringing the game into disrepute...
that is your opinion i know but an opinion which i don't think has much foundation (which is my opinion)... m'lud
so in summary i agree with you but disagree with you
lordy i need me another cold tin of harp... FATHER!!!
don't mind saying that the dude hanson grates my nuts, but my gut feel is that... yes, it's harsh. the application of the law is all over the place at the mo so hard to look at it objectively
i do not however buy in to your points re 'quasi immunity' for english players or 'english bias' and your allegations of the 'blazers' bringing the game into disrepute...
that is your opinion i know but an opinion which i don't think has much foundation (which is my opinion)... m'lud
so in summary i agree with you but disagree with you
lordy i need me another cold tin of harp... FATHER!!!
-
- Lord Chancellor
- Posts: 4281
- Joined: Sun Aug 21, 2005 5:51 pm
- Location: Mid Down
Jamesie
I refer to the history regarding for example Martin Johnson where leniency was always the norm and to the suggestion that the SRU and IRFU panel members would not have been fair to an English player cited. What I am saying is that both scenarios are wrong and would be an indictment of the blazers. Maybe I am really a soul mate of Will Carling who described the game if I remember correctly as run by a bunch of old farts!!
Anyway I am unlikely to be appraised of the inadequacy of my judgements by Deceased Testicles' "Wise Up".
I refer to the history regarding for example Martin Johnson where leniency was always the norm and to the suggestion that the SRU and IRFU panel members would not have been fair to an English player cited. What I am saying is that both scenarios are wrong and would be an indictment of the blazers. Maybe I am really a soul mate of Will Carling who described the game if I remember correctly as run by a bunch of old farts!!
Anyway I am unlikely to be appraised of the inadequacy of my judgements by Deceased Testicles' "Wise Up".
-
- Lord Chancellor
- Posts: 4281
- Joined: Sun Aug 21, 2005 5:51 pm
- Location: Mid Down
Deadtestes
Do you have an argument, a reasoned point, a thesis or a modest proposal to put forward or is it just Wise Up and Wind your Neck In which I find moronic? If you don't agree, why don't you agree? Explain to me how I am wrong. Adduce some evidence. Back up your stance, whatever it is, as it is not at all clear.
Do you have an argument, a reasoned point, a thesis or a modest proposal to put forward or is it just Wise Up and Wind your Neck In which I find moronic? If you don't agree, why don't you agree? Explain to me how I am wrong. Adduce some evidence. Back up your stance, whatever it is, as it is not at all clear.
Oh do you mean FACTS?
By the fact you are trying to insult me in your use of names I sense you may not be able to be reasoned with DOG.
So run along and get back in to bed before Mummy finds youre still up, theres a good lad!
By the fact you are trying to insult me in your use of names I sense you may not be able to be reasoned with DOG.
So run along and get back in to bed before Mummy finds youre still up, theres a good lad!
The trouble with referees is that they just don't care which side wins - Tom Canterbury.
Ulster proud sponsors of Comical Eddie!
Ulster proud sponsors of Comical Eddie!
-
- Lord Chancellor
- Posts: 4281
- Joined: Sun Aug 21, 2005 5:51 pm
- Location: Mid Down