The UAFC

Day 8 Diageo free and the sky hasn't fallen in.
.
Fek them

rumncoke wrote:It will be interesting to see if Guinness cease to be sponsors of Leinster after one of their players p-ssed on someone at an end of season club binge .


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

That’s a marketing opportunity, surely? Tena might be very interested in reaching out to younger incontinents.

Interesting DIageo had no fecks to give when Ben Te'o was cleared of a serious assault just months before Leinster announced his signing. IRFU had him lined up as a project player!

https://www.brisbanetimes.com.au/nation ... 2naus.html

https://www.heraldsun.com.au/news/natio ... 2b53acbe56

This is a targeted witch hunt!

Pre- Metoo 9.

Has this all died down now, are we better shutting our cakeholes or pushing back against Diageo?

Btw liked them on bakebook, will be interesting to see how they compare to UR and their excellence

Cap'n Grumpy wrote:

stev1eG wrote:... a bunch of other Scotch whiskys (hate that spelling!) ...

Try spelling it whiskies then

Agree with the sentiment of your post however, even though I did find Kilkenny quite palatable from time to time. Not anymore though.

Good point, though the emphasis was on the missing 'e' and I do believe either spelling can suffice (though 'whiskies' might be preferable).

Can't say I have ever had Kilkenny (knowlingly).

So Sean O'Brien sanctioned by IRFU. What does that mean?

Jetstream wrote:So Sean O'Brien sanctioned by IRFU. What does that mean?

Nothing.

“Sanctioned” ?when guilty and Exiled when innocent — don’t you love Irish Justice

The consistency of a pigs skitter


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Sean O'Brien should not be allowed play for Leinster or Ireland ever again, this year, before his contract expires, until he recovers from his operation

He may never play again. He probably received a fine.

stev1eG wrote:

Cap'n Grumpy wrote:

stev1eG wrote:... a bunch of other Scotch whiskys (hate that spelling!) ...

Try spelling it whiskies then

Agree with the sentiment of your post however, even though I did find Kilkenny quite palatable from time to time. Not anymore though.

Good point, though the emphasis was on the missing 'e' and I do believe either spelling can suffice (though 'whiskies' might be preferable).

Close but no cigar

Whiskies isn't preferable - that's the plural of Scotch (and Japanese etc).

Whiskeys is preferable - that's the plural of Irish (and USA - Bourbon etc)

So in summary, whiskies or whiskeys but not whiskys

Cap'n Grumpy wrote:

stev1eG wrote:

Cap'n Grumpy wrote:

stev1eG wrote:... a bunch of other Scotch whiskys (hate that spelling!) ...

Try spelling it whiskies then

Agree with the sentiment of your post however, even though I did find Kilkenny quite palatable from time to time. Not anymore though.

Good point, though the emphasis was on the missing 'e' and I do believe either spelling can suffice (though 'whiskies' might be preferable).

Close but no cigar

Whiskies isn't preferable - that's the plural of Scotch (and Japanese etc).

Whiskeys is preferable - that's the plural of Irish (and USA - Bourbon etc)

So in summary, whiskies or whiskeys but not whiskys

Errmmmm! I was trying to be subtle, without explicitly pointing out that I prefer Irish whiskey (with an 'e') as opposed to Scotch and/or Japanese (though I do like a number of Japanese *whiskies/whiskys).

*delete as appropriate to suit your taste

I promise to be more blunt in future.

Tried the official site to buy a shirt; either I'm in the wrong site or it is empty?