Are we allowed to talk about KINGSPAN

Talk about the men in white, and everything Ulster!!

Moderator: Moderators

rumncoke
Lord Chancellor
Posts: 7889
Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2011 3:39 pm

Re: Are we allowed to talk about KINGSPAN

Post by rumncoke »

It makes sense to have both the Stadium and shirt sponsorship available at the same time the two combined being more valuable.
Within this carapace of skepticism there lives an optimist
jean valjean
Chancellor to the King
Posts: 3159
Joined: Fri Oct 07, 2016 10:03 pm

Re: Are we allowed to talk about KINGSPAN

Post by jean valjean »

Conchúr Mac Adaim, of Community Action Tenants Union (CATU) in Belfast, said Ulster Rugby supporters do not welcome the sponsorship extension.

"It appears to us that Ulster Rugby's management cares more about the financial relationship with Kingspan than it does the opinions of supporters who are opposed to the continued presence of Kingspan in our local rugby club," he said.

Don't recall being asked for my opinion Image.

https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-northern-ireland-66244387
Big-al
Lord Chancellor
Posts: 5029
Joined: Sat Mar 29, 2008 10:20 am

Re: Are we allowed to talk about KINGSPAN

Post by Big-al »

These are no doubt the same people who claimed to be supporters during the Paddy Jackson trial.
mea97mb
Squire
Posts: 730
Joined: Wed Aug 04, 2010 9:37 am

Re: Are we allowed to talk about KINGSPAN

Post by mea97mb »

However small their involvement in Grenfell is, that they keep claiming however that is not the point for me. The faking of fire safety results that appears to have been widespread in the company and industry as revealed by the inquiry shows that it was more luck than anything else that it wasn't a tower they were more involved in where this happened.

Putting that argument aside the optics of this extension are awful, they previously could hide behind a signed contract but to then go ahead and extend it beggars belief in my opinion and is so misjudged. Especially when they stated that they have engaged with the Grenfell groups, engaged clearly means humour them. Speaking of beggars, maybe that's the reason we had to extend as likely not too many takers in the current climate.

On PJ and SO situation, this is another example of taking money over principle. Perhaps our next sponsor will be the PIF as they are buying up everything else.
User avatar
Jackie Brown
Rí­ na Cúige Uladh
Posts: 11723
Joined: Sat Jun 11, 2005 1:15 pm
Location: Carrickfergus

Re: Are we allowed to talk about KINGSPAN

Post by Jackie Brown »

Look lads, at least they didn't receive an unsavoury WhatsApp message. That's what really matters when it comes to virtue signalling.

Sent from my Pixel 7 using Tapatalk

Gonna Party Like It's 1999
CIMANFOREVER
Lord Chancellor
Posts: 4679
Joined: Sat Oct 30, 2010 6:16 pm
Location: The Dufferin

Re: Are we allowed to talk about KINGSPAN

Post by CIMANFOREVER »

Jackie Brown wrote: Thu Jul 20, 2023 3:00 pm Look lads, at least they didn't receive an unsavoury WhatsApp message. That's what really matters when it comes to virtue signalling.

Sent from my Pixel 7 using Tapatalk
Maybe there was plenty of spit to lubricate the deal?
Money always talks and Bullshyte walks...
Sure BOI are our moral authority anyway. Logie would be proud
Exterminate all rational thought
CIMANFOREVER
Lord Chancellor
Posts: 4679
Joined: Sat Oct 30, 2010 6:16 pm
Location: The Dufferin

Re: Are we allowed to talk about KINGSPAN

Post by CIMANFOREVER »

jean valjean wrote: Wed Jul 19, 2023 2:43 pm Conchúr Mac Adaim, of Community Action Tenants Union (CATU) in Belfast, said Ulster Rugby supporters do not welcome the sponsorship extension.

"It appears to us that Ulster Rugby's management cares more about the financial relationship with Kingspan than it does the opinions of supporters who are opposed to the continued presence of Kingspan in our local rugby club," he said.

Don't recall being asked for my opinion Image.

https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-northern-ireland-66244387
Whoooo? :scratch:
Exterminate all rational thought
Lurgan Lad
Warrior Chief
Posts: 1605
Joined: Wed May 27, 2009 7:27 pm

Re: Are we allowed to talk about KINGSPAN

Post by Lurgan Lad »

Frankly I'm glad UR are happy to partner with Kingspan, it isn't as if the company is rotten to the core. I've had enough of this cancel culture, of both Kingspan, SO & PJ and many others, people do make mistakes and that shouldn't destroy the rest of their lives.
Sue Dename
Novice
Posts: 143
Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2016 9:05 pm

Re: Are we allowed to talk about KINGSPAN

Post by Sue Dename »

Im sure if Conchúr Mac Adaim can conjure up a new sponsor prepared to stump up near £1m then JP boys would talk to them.
So It Is
Initiate
Posts: 363
Joined: Tue Dec 07, 2021 9:55 am

Re: Are we allowed to talk about KINGSPAN

Post by So It Is »

Anyone able to copy and paste Sam McBride's article in the BelTel? Fairly aggressive article headline!
Bobbievee
Warrior
Posts: 1178
Joined: Wed Feb 27, 2019 11:36 pm

Re: Are we allowed to talk about KINGSPAN

Post by Bobbievee »

https://www.belfasttelegraph.co.uk/opin ... 99973.html

Try this but might be behind catwalk
Also carried in Irish Independent
Bobbievee
Warrior
Posts: 1178
Joined: Wed Feb 27, 2019 11:36 pm

Re: Are we allowed to talk about KINGSPAN

Post by Bobbievee »

Paywall!
DodgyEverything
Novice
Posts: 106
Joined: Mon Mar 28, 2022 8:33 am

Re: Are we allowed to talk about KINGSPAN

Post by DodgyEverything »

Just so everyone knows what not to look at, so that they don't accidentally cicrumvent said paywall https://archive.is/ypLj1
Big-al
Lord Chancellor
Posts: 5029
Joined: Sat Mar 29, 2008 10:20 am

Re: Are we allowed to talk about KINGSPAN

Post by Big-al »

feck hell.

That last sentence. What a Cnut Mr McBride is.
So It Is
Initiate
Posts: 363
Joined: Tue Dec 07, 2021 9:55 am

Re: Are we allowed to talk about KINGSPAN

Post by So It Is »

Big-al wrote: Mon Jul 24, 2023 8:28 am feck hell.

That last sentence. What a Cnut Mr McBride is.
Yep. Dramatic alarmism is fairly prominent in contemporary media, as those column inches ain't going to fill themselves if there is no actual news to write about. Highly doubt McBride would have bothered to do a piece on UR if the parades commission had blocked a march, or if another GAA club were caught singing RA songs.

Everyone knows Ulster are one PR embarrassment after another. If they were going to fire the Top Shaggers based on reputational damage, then its genuinely laughable how they haven't binned Kingspan here.

The only rational reason is because no one would pay big money as the on-field product is on the decline, as is the match day experience, and the ambition of actually winning a trophy. But that still doesn't stick, if you are going to wave about the morality card.
Post Reply