Re: Schools Cup 2016
Posted: Fri Mar 18, 2016 1:12 am
MotherloadCap'n Grumpy wrote:Wonder if Campbell wanted to be winning at half-time?
The Ulternative Alster Fan Club supporting Ulster Rugby!
https://www.uafc.co.uk/
MotherloadCap'n Grumpy wrote:Wonder if Campbell wanted to be winning at half-time?
My main concern now is converting these supposed talents into professional rugby playersKofi Annan wrote:A fine example of shît rugby. Glad I didn't waste my money on it, first game missed in about 40 odd years.
Watched some of it on telly Campbell should hang their heads in shame, a classic example how to lose a game.
He also mentioned somebody's grandfather, a "senior civil servant", who was responsible for the Ravenhill floodlightsGary wrote:Gusher mentioned everybody who had ever played in a Schools' Cup Final.
.
Conor Field do you mean?Moiraman wrote:Conor Finn didn't really get the opportunity to show his pace yesterday but from what I saw in the semi final he has the pace and talent to make it the professional level.
Based on one game it is impossible to say one way or another whether anyone will make it, especially in a tight final dominated by schoolboy nerves.Russ wrote:My main concern now is converting these supposed talents into professional rugby playersKofi Annan wrote:A fine example of shît rugby. Glad I didn't waste my money on it, first game missed in about 40 odd years.
Watched some of it on telly Campbell should hang their heads in shame, a classic example how to lose a game.
I doubt a single player from yesterday will make it
Compare to the standard in leinster in the short term and in 5 years time let's revisit this post and see me correct one againLegsLikeSausages wrote:Based on one game it is impossible to say one way or another whether anyone will make it, especially in a tight final dominated by schoolboy nerves.Russ wrote:My main concern now is converting these supposed talents into professional rugby playersKofi Annan wrote:A fine example of shît rugby. Glad I didn't waste my money on it, first game missed in about 40 odd years.
Watched some of it on telly Campbell should hang their heads in shame, a classic example how to lose a game.
I doubt a single player from yesterday will make it
You talk sh*te at the best of times Russ, but you've surpassed yourself here.
You might be. Just saying your prediction is as reliable as mystic Meg's crystal ball based on one nervous game.Russ wrote:Compare to the standard in leinster in the short term and in 5 years time let's revisit this post and see me correct one againLegsLikeSausages wrote:Based on one game it is impossible to say one way or another whether anyone will make it, especially in a tight final dominated by schoolboy nerves.Russ wrote:My main concern now is converting these supposed talents into professional rugby playersKofi Annan wrote:A fine example of shît rugby. Glad I didn't waste my money on it, first game missed in about 40 odd years.
Watched some of it on telly Campbell should hang their heads in shame, a classic example how to lose a game.
I doubt a single player from yesterday will make it
You talk sh*te at the best of times Russ, but you've surpassed yourself here.
I would think any school that has won back to backs and 4 from 4 this year would be providing the bulk of the academyrumncoke wrote:Out of 46 players present if 6 are still playing rugby in 5 years time it would be a winning final and maybe two will Make beyond club level
The dominate feature of the game was the slow recycle by the Poshboys and the quality of the defence by "the Master Race "
Hume looks a big lad for a centre and time is on his side as for the rest a schools final is not sound base .
The reason is that school XV s contain boys between 16 and 18 years old the higher the average age then the greater the chance of success and some players look better because they are older.
The transfer to Pro is about physical development attitude and opportunity by that I mean to make say Ulster a player must not be just as good as the current player in his position but better because the current holder has what he lacks and that's experience and experience is not just confined to the game but to the desires of the coach and how his team mates play .
Sent from my iPod touch using Tapatalk
I know you're being provocative Russ, but the margin between the best 4 or 5 schools in the competition is very small so that would be a ridiculous assumption. Also, a lot of boys feel that the Schools' Cup is the pinnacle of their rugby "career" before choosing another career in medicine, law, accountancy etc etc.Russ wrote:I would think any school that has won back to backs and 4 from 4 this year would be providing the bulk of the academyrumncoke wrote:Out of 46 players present if 6 are still playing rugby in 5 years time it would be a winning final and maybe two will Make beyond club level
The dominate feature of the game was the slow recycle by the Poshboys and the quality of the defence by "the Master Race "
Hume looks a big lad for a centre and time is on his side as for the rest a schools final is not sound base .
The reason is that school XV s contain boys between 16 and 18 years old the higher the average age then the greater the chance of success and some players look better because they are older.
The transfer to Pro is about physical development attitude and opportunity by that I mean to make say Ulster a player must not be just as good as the current player in his position but better because the current holder has what he lacks and that's experience and experience is not just confined to the game but to the desires of the coach and how his team mates play .
Sent from my iPod touch using Tapatalk