Stadium Redevelopment Photos 2012-2014

Talk about the men in white, and everything Ulster!!

Moderator: Moderators

User avatar
ruckover
Lord Chancellor
Posts: 7609
Joined: Wed Oct 12, 2011 1:02 pm
Location: My house

Re: Stadium Redevelopment Photos 2012-2014

Post by ruckover »

Jackie Brown wrote:If they fill in the corners surely they'll need to create some sort of tunnel access under there stand onto the terrace.
Thought that myself. Not impossible - I think Northampton do it even though they don't have a terrace.
You haven't seen me at my best yet. Let's be honest, you probably never will.
User avatar
BR
Rí­ na Cúige Uladh
Posts: 18579
Joined: Mon Jun 13, 2005 11:12 am
Location: On a roll.

Re: Stadium Redevelopment Photos 2012-2014

Post by BR »

I think the sight lines should be ok for a few extra metres.
Can I come out from behind the sofa yet?
www.stoutboys.co.uk
User avatar
Kofi Annan
Lord Chancellor
Posts: 6920
Joined: Wed Jan 04, 2006 3:10 pm

Re: Stadium Redevelopment Photos 2012-2014

Post by Kofi Annan »

Back loading will cut the cost of stewarding :cheers:
“For the liespotter who knows how to listen well, the random words, sounds, and phrases in a person's speech are never as random as they seem. They offer a clear sightline into the liar's psyche.”
User avatar
Neil F
Lord Chancellor
Posts: 4045
Joined: Thu Feb 07, 2008 1:34 am
Location: Berlin

Re: Stadium Redevelopment Photos 2012-2014

Post by Neil F »

Amiga; The fly through, I believe, is the most recent material released. It shows the Aquinas End to be front-loading but to have both a seated and terraced area. The Memorial End and the new Old Stand will be accessed via vomatories for both the seated and standing areas. This can all clearly be seen in the fly-through video, although I do accept that the actual plans may have changed since its release in November.

Judging from this fly-through, however, the three new new stands will be built to have the same rake, number of rows and roofing solutions, making them easy to fill in. The problems with linking all of this to the existing terrace seem significantly more problematic than roof heights, however. If appropriately designed, I could see how there could be a continuous ring of terracing around the whole stadium. After that, it seems fairly hopeless to link the structures together. I imagine that (beyond the potential ring of terracing), filling in all four corners would involve some kind of break between the terrace and the new structure (think how the ends at Stamford Bridge meet the sides). Perhaps those who saw the presentation mentioned before could elucidate this?
User avatar
Russ
Rí­ na Cúige Uladh
Posts: 28295
Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2012 2:27 pm
Location: Looking for George North's defence

Re: Stadium Redevelopment Photos 2012-2014

Post by Russ »

Kofi Annan wrote:Back loading will cut the cost of stewarding :cheers:
Have no fear, McDonalds will open a new store to take on these new recruits
User avatar
AyeYerMa
Red Hand Ambassador
Posts: 2768
Joined: Sun Oct 10, 2010 9:44 pm
Location: Belshaft, Norn Iron

Re: Stadium Redevelopment Photos 2012-2014

Post by AyeYerMa »

If the end stands are going to be seated with a terrace, couldn't they fill the corners at seated level and not do the terracing?

then you'd be able to walk in under the seats... Like a tunnel...

has anyone but me the slightest idea what I'm talking about?
I came for my woman, he came with a razor blade,
Bound like us all for the ocean
Amiga500
Warrior Chief
Posts: 1691
Joined: Thu Aug 30, 2012 1:42 pm

Re: Stadium Redevelopment Photos 2012-2014

Post by Amiga500 »

Rooster wrote:Hang on why move 3 or 4 m, the front stays the same and you just use top step or 2 as walkway surely ?
I'm pretty sure the health and safety bunch would say nope.
Rooster wrote: 4m is 13 feet which is a hell of a lot more than the current walkway ?
It'd be 3m wouldn't it? I'm just trying to think if I was lying flat on it (6ft), would I go much beyond halfway across the walkway.
Amiga500
Warrior Chief
Posts: 1691
Joined: Thu Aug 30, 2012 1:42 pm

Re: Stadium Redevelopment Photos 2012-2014

Post by Amiga500 »

AyeYerMa wrote:has anyone but me the slightest idea what I'm talking about?
Yip, know exactly what you mean.


But they definitely wouldn't be able to raise the capacity from 18K to 26-28K that way. :?
User avatar
BR
Rí­ na Cúige Uladh
Posts: 18579
Joined: Mon Jun 13, 2005 11:12 am
Location: On a roll.

Re: Stadium Redevelopment Photos 2012-2014

Post by BR »

Don't think I've seen that sort of capacity mentioned anywhere but on this forum.
Can I come out from behind the sofa yet?
www.stoutboys.co.uk
User avatar
Rooster
Rí­ na Cúige Uladh
Posts: 40137
Joined: Sat Jun 11, 2005 12:39 am
Location: Chicken coop 17

Re: Stadium Redevelopment Photos 2012-2014

Post by Rooster »

Amiga500 wrote:
AyeYerMa wrote:has anyone but me the slightest idea what I'm talking about?
Yip, know exactly what you mean.


But they definitely wouldn't be able to raise the capacity from 18K to 26-28K that way. :?
It was never mentioned anywhere to raise it to that level, estimate I heard was 23k, which does sound achievable.
“That made me feel very special and underlined to me that Ulster is more than a team, it is a community and a rugby family"
Rory Best
Katrinka
Novice
Posts: 32
Joined: Sun Mar 20, 2011 6:50 pm

Re: Stadium Redevelopment Photos 2012-2014

Post by Katrinka »

We were at the meeting mentioned in the early season and in the presentation the figure of up to 26, 000 could be achieved by filling in the corners. Was not being considered in the short term or 1st phase however.
User avatar
BR
Rí­ na Cúige Uladh
Posts: 18579
Joined: Mon Jun 13, 2005 11:12 am
Location: On a roll.

Re: Stadium Redevelopment Photos 2012-2014

Post by BR »

Rooster wrote:
Amiga500 wrote:
AyeYerMa wrote:has anyone but me the slightest idea what I'm talking about?
Yip, know exactly what you mean.


But they definitely wouldn't be able to raise the capacity from 18K to 26-28K that way. :?
It was never mentioned anywhere to raise it to that level, estimate I heard was 23k, which does sound achievable.
Ditto
Can I come out from behind the sofa yet?
www.stoutboys.co.uk
User avatar
Cap'n Grumpy
Rí­ na Cúige Uladh
Posts: 15684
Joined: Thu Aug 14, 2008 4:21 pm
Location: second barrier up, at the half-way line ... or is the third?

Re: Stadium Redevelopment Photos 2012-2014

Post by Cap'n Grumpy »

Katrinka wrote:We were at the meeting mentioned in the early season and in the presentation the figure of up to 26, 000 could be achieved by filling in the corners. Was not being considered in the short term or 1st phase however.
I concur with that.
I'm not arguing -
I'm just explaining why I'm right
User avatar
big mervyn
Rí­ na Cúige Uladh
Posts: 14384
Joined: Fri May 09, 2008 2:22 pm
Location: Overlooking the pitch (til they built the old new stand)

Re: Stadium Redevelopment Photos 2012-2014

Post by big mervyn »

This thread is seriously off topic. I haven't seen a real photo for about 3 pages.
Volunteer at an animal sanctuary; it will fill you with joy , despair, but most of all love, unconditional love of the animals.
Big Neville Southall
User avatar
Snipe Watson
Rí­ na Cúige Uladh
Posts: 23443
Joined: Mon Sep 08, 2008 6:42 pm

Re: Stadium Redevelopment Photos 2012-2014

Post by Snipe Watson »

Did I imagine it, or are we getting a Desso Grass pitch too?
Post Reply