Marcell Speculation

Talk about the men in white, and everything Ulster!!

Moderator: Moderators

Bart S
Lord Chancellor
Posts: 4335
Joined: Sun Jan 28, 2007 11:48 am

Re: Marcell Speculation

Post by Bart S »

Fully expected the future Bulls player to leave at the end of his contract. Disappointed he is not honouring in it. He could have gone home in another season and stayed there for the rest of his life.
Anyway, pressure is on him now to deliver top class performances until the end of the season and show the right attitude. If he can help Ulster to win the Pro14 trophy this season then that would certainly ease the disappointment.
User avatar
Dave
Rí­ na Cúige Uladh
Posts: 24601
Joined: Fri Apr 08, 2011 4:27 pm

Re: Marcell Speculation

Post by Dave »

justinr73 wrote:Yes, Ulster should have ascertained what MC’s likely reaction to a global pandemic would be and released him two years ago for nothing if the answer was a concern.
WTF are you on about?
I have my own tv channel, what have you got?
Bart S
Lord Chancellor
Posts: 4335
Joined: Sun Jan 28, 2007 11:48 am

Re: Marcell Speculation

Post by Bart S »

justinr73 wrote: Mon Dec 28, 2020 1:42 am Yes, Ulster should have ascertained what MC’s likely reaction to a global pandemic would be and released him two years ago for nothing if the answer was a concern.
It is difficult to know how much the pandemic played in this decision. As far as I am aware he went home for a good part of the lockdown so he was one of the lucky ones - lots of people haven’t had that opportunity.

I don’t have him in the John Afoa/Jono Gibbes category - but am a bit disappointed in his decision.
User avatar
Dave
Rí­ na Cúige Uladh
Posts: 24601
Joined: Fri Apr 08, 2011 4:27 pm

Re: Marcell Speculation

Post by Dave »

Some of you cheeseballs are so green it's unbelievable. You might actually bring the shaft to your own shafting. It's now completely unreasonable to expect a player to fulfill his contract that he agreed to, is it? No gun pointed to his head when he signed it but you say the words 'family' and 'homesick', everyone goes awwwwww...now if you add in COVID and FCUKING PANDEMIC!!! You get bonus sympathy points. He looked to be in SA during lockdown. I think it's too easy to be using that without full disclosure on how the bulls deal transpired.

Petrie has stated this was player driven AND bulls. The bulls have been name dropping him for weeks knowing legally they can't talk to him directly. There are always ways round this through other channels, family members etc. This reeks.

I am disappointed in Marcell but more annoyed with Ulster. Bulls are scumbags. They claim they want to become like Barcelona or Juventus. Wrong sport for a start. I hope to see them at ravers next season. I also hope they are shyte. Bull-shyte. Haha I have achieved comedy.
I have my own tv channel, what have you got?
User avatar
Cap'n Grumpy
Rí­ na Cúige Uladh
Posts: 15666
Joined: Thu Aug 14, 2008 4:21 pm
Location: second barrier up, at the half-way line ... or is the third?

Re: Marcell Speculation

Post by Cap'n Grumpy »

Dave wrote: Mon Dec 28, 2020 3:09 am ...now if you add in COVID and FCUKING PANDEMIC!!! ...
:shock:

I've heard about Covid - it's been on the news from time to time, but I never heard about thon other pandemic. :o

If they're trying to create a vaccine for that, where can I sign up to get on a clinical trial?

Preferably in the placebo group.

Even the missus can't complain if it's for medical research, shirley?
I'm not arguing -
I'm just explaining why I'm right
lovesthehardground
Steward
Posts: 935
Joined: Sat Jan 08, 2011 12:56 pm
Location: Off the radar

Re: Marcell Speculation

Post by lovesthehardground »

People on here are too soft. There's so much sympathy for this guy because he's homesick. Then there's talk of what professionalism means and how everyone here would change jobs for a better offer. Well two things.
If MC was such a good professional he would honour his contract. That's what is expected of 'professionals'. This is a very selfish decision and I for one would pi$h him out the door straight away. You don't want any bad apples in the barrel. Imagine being beside this guy at half time when you're 12-10 down and about to play up the hill into the wind. Would you truly trust him to put a shift in?!
Secondly professionalism has ruined rugby. It was once a game that you would encourage kids to play. They would have learned so many values. Honesty, team work, reward for effort.......etc. Now all they would learn is greed and self promotion. That's the example being set by this lauded professional.
LTHG
User avatar
big mervyn
Rí­ na Cúige Uladh
Posts: 14375
Joined: Fri May 09, 2008 2:22 pm
Location: Overlooking the pitch (til they built the old new stand)

Re: Marcell Speculation

Post by big mervyn »

justinr73 wrote: Mon Dec 28, 2020 1:42 am Yes, Ulster should have ascertained what MC’s likely reaction to a global pandemic would be and released him two years ago for nothing if the answer was a concern.
Reaction to a global pandemic my absolute hole. 😅😷😅 What about all the rest of us getting on with it ffs. Anybody in a care home here might as well have been in feckin SA for the past year as far as their relatives are concerned

I'm afraid I'm only getting increasingly irritated by this. Yes, if he doesn't want to stay let him feck off but make the severance as punitive as his contract allows.
Volunteer at an animal sanctuary; it will fill you with joy , despair, but most of all love, unconditional love of the animals.
Big Neville Southall
justinr73
Lord Chancellor
Posts: 5825
Joined: Thu Aug 07, 2014 1:14 pm

Re: Marcell Speculation

Post by justinr73 »

A bit of faux outrage has certainly brought the forum back to life.

The irony is that whilst all this has being going on, Marcell has played with more ferocity, commitment and impact than he ever has before.

A bad apple my hole and nor is he the only person to reassess this year by any means.

The chances are that had he not retuned to SA for an extended period, allowing better access to him for tapping up purposes, a reminder of what the sun look likes and a proximity to family in times of an international health emergency, than he probably would have been at Ulster for another year.

Twelve months is a long time in rugby. Bulls would have signed someone else, youngsters came through and injury can finish you in a heartbeat.

In just about every other sport, fans don’t seem to hold the players to higher standards than they would expect of, and demonstrate, themselves. Contracts, be it employment contracts or marriage contracts, get broken. They exist, as much as anything else, as a mechanism to allow for financial redress.

My disappointment is not in Marcel himself but in losing the team’s talisman. However, things quickly move on and nobody is bigger than the club.

Whether or not Ulster should have allowed him to leave depends if you’re pragmatic or dogmatic but, in any rational analysis, it doesn’t take much to outweigh the ‘benefits’ of keeping a player who wants to leave and will, come what may, for nothing in twelve months anyway.

So thanks for the memories Marcell. And for livening up the forum a bit.
Dharper
Steward
Posts: 851
Joined: Thu Dec 17, 2015 5:30 pm

Re: Marcell Speculation

Post by Dharper »

MCs performance levels have been ridiculous during this extended period of speculation - literally weeks of MOTMs....no trips home missing fixtures, no dips in form, no twinges effecting selection, no behind the scenes disruptive attitude. All of which could have benefited him getting out the door. I expect him to continue to tear it up til end of season.

So I have narrowed the speculation re replacement to 4 players based on KOTH & Justin73.
Can I confirm a few things please to make a final choice (in my head)?

KOTH has this fella occasionally operated in the 2nd row but primarily backrow?
Justin is he an out & out 8, or can he play across the backrow?
Is this fella currently playing for his home province, or at a 2nd province?
justinr73
Lord Chancellor
Posts: 5825
Joined: Thu Aug 07, 2014 1:14 pm

Re: Marcell Speculation

Post by justinr73 »

The reach and attraction of Ulster go a hell of a lot further than Dublin :stir:

I should admit that my sources had indicated it was Mata. I think it very nearly was.
Dharper
Steward
Posts: 851
Joined: Thu Dec 17, 2015 5:30 pm

Re: Marcell Speculation

Post by Dharper »

Ok that’s one out - Josh Murphy, not Deegan. (More based on Koths clue)
Ok.....I suspect I know the province.....down to 3 players.
Come on KOTH answer my q’s please?
launish116
Initiate
Posts: 300
Joined: Sat Oct 06, 2012 12:25 pm

Re: Marcell Speculation

Post by launish116 »

Dharper wrote: Mon Dec 28, 2020 11:24 am Ok that’s one out - Josh Murphy, not Deegan. (More based on Koths clue)
Ok.....I suspect I know the province.....down to 3 players.
Come on KOTH answer my q’s please?
Who have you in the running?
justinr73 wrote: Mon Dec 28, 2020 11:10 am The reach and attraction of Ulster go a hell of a lot further than Dublin :stir:

I should admit that my sources had indicated it was Mata. I think it very nearly was.
Did consider him myself as a good fit with our open game.

Realistically as much as we’ll miss Coetzee, there’s an opportunity for a decent operator and a decent squad player/prospect with his salary cash. Think depth is more important than all our eggs in one basket going forward.
User avatar
Dave
Rí­ na Cúige Uladh
Posts: 24601
Joined: Fri Apr 08, 2011 4:27 pm

Re: Marcell Speculation

Post by Dave »

Cap'n Grumpy wrote:
Dave wrote: Mon Dec 28, 2020 3:09 am ...now if you add in COVID and FCUKING PANDEMIC!!! ...
:shock:

I've heard about Covid - it's been on the news from time to time, but I never heard about thon other pandemic. :o

If they're trying to create a vaccine for that, where can I sign up to get on a clinical trial?

Preferably in the placebo group.

Even the missus can't complain if it's for medical research, shirley?
I'm not so sure. That was a beery eyed surprise for me to read that this morning. It was a new variant of craft beer I was sampling. It has left me a little strained. I have had my first jab already. It didn't knock me out so I think I will go the distance.
I have my own tv channel, what have you got?
User avatar
Dave
Rí­ na Cúige Uladh
Posts: 24601
Joined: Fri Apr 08, 2011 4:27 pm

Re: Marcell Speculation

Post by Dave »

Dharper wrote:MCs performance levels have been ridiculous during this extended period of speculation - literally weeks of MOTMs....no trips home missing fixtures, no dips in form, no twinges effecting selection, no behind the scenes disruptive attitude. All of which could have benefited him getting out the door. I expect him to continue to tear it up til end of season.

So I have narrowed the speculation re replacement to 4 players based on KOTH & Justin73.
Can I confirm a few things please to make a final choice (in my head)?

KOTH has this fella occasionally operated in the 2nd row but primarily backrow?
Justin is he an out & out 8, or can he play across the backrow?
Is this fella currently playing for his home province, or at a 2nd province?
Justin73 is the shyte on KOTH's shoe. He is probably neither called Justin nor actually 73. His sauce is HP and 'bro, trust me'. Best to ignore his BS. KOTH is an information god.
I have my own tv channel, what have you got?
User avatar
Starsky
Initiate
Posts: 353
Joined: Fri Jan 07, 2011 11:00 pm

Re: Marcell Speculation

Post by Starsky »

It isn’t too long ago an Ulster head coach and DoR held meetings with a well known international with time to run on his contract, but ultimately baulked at following through on a deal when the player’s home union played hardball over the compensation required to release him from his contract.

We haven’t been whiter than white ourselves in the past, nor can you be when headhunting. I do wonder what would happen if Marcel has another bad injury before the end of the season. Will the Bulls be as keen to take him home? I would hope that Ulster have a watertight clause in any agreement reached that his contract terminates no matter what the circumstances are.
One does not simply walk into Ulster
Post Reply