Page 21 of 52

Re: PADDY JACKSON

Posted: Fri Dec 04, 2020 7:29 am
by rumncoke
Jackie recording would have made little difference given who she was. They would have got charged with something else

her chat up line now is " let me ruin your life " as far as I can see . It was the stupid macho messages which they should have deleted -- because even without going into the witness box there were at least 10 things that supported the eye witness's statement that it was consensual.

Non of the prosecution witnesses were in Jackson's house that night -- taxi man heard her sobbing , forensics confirmed the uncontested -- but never identified when or how and only one successful bj , her mates repeated what she told them and "assumed" it was the truth and the police did little other than take statements, and try to support hers. Interviewing Dara and Rory twice. and tracing messages

No sounds of aggression, no shout for help ( with known help available), moaning , the way she reacted when the door opened , Paddy's lack of concern when the door opened, Dara's immediate reaction - open door, saw what was happening closed the door walked away , going back to the house and up the stairs to Paddy's room for her phone , sharing a taxi with the mate of 3 guys who she alleges raped her, her message to him her delay to inform him of her lies . Lack of concern of paddy and Stuart the next morning clearly shows they did not know she left crying in a taxi with Rory --every parent knows the truth never starts with a lie .

If it looks like a duck, walks like a duck and quacks like a duck ---- its a f-----g duck

Re: PADDY JACKSON

Posted: Sat Dec 05, 2020 6:48 pm
by Lurgan Lad
I think you are missing Jackie's point, he is referring to a couple of guys down Munster way if memory serves.

Re: PADDY JACKSON

Posted: Sun Dec 06, 2020 1:17 am
by rumncoke
I realised that but you've missed four important words in my post " given who she was "

Re: PADDY JACKSON

Posted: Sun Dec 06, 2020 9:21 pm
by rumncoke
Watched Jackson this afternoon — while not a perfect 80 mins he was more assured than either of two playing in green yesterday - missed one penalty but created the only LI try with a well timed wrap , break , and pass, more flair

Re: PADDY JACKSON

Posted: Mon Dec 07, 2020 12:20 pm
by Aird
Also watched PJ yesterday and noted how often he took the ballon the line and the smooth effortless way he kicked the ball a real natural.Now I think that Billy Burns is greatly under rated by many Irish Pundits and I like his commitment and inventiveness I still miss PJ.

Re: PADDY JACKSON

Posted: Mon Dec 07, 2020 6:29 pm
by big mervyn
The Ginger Prince has been nominated for Premiership player of the month.

Vote here

https://www.premiershiprugby.com/news/v ... -the-month

Re: PADDY JACKSON

Posted: Mon Dec 07, 2020 7:44 pm
by volvo
>clapping Got my vote

Re: PADDY JACKSON

Posted: Mon Dec 07, 2020 8:29 pm
by solidarity
Vote early, vote often. It's the Ulster way.

Re: PADDY JACKSON

Posted: Tue Dec 08, 2020 9:39 am
by rumncoke
The poll is now closed --- wonder why ? Maybe they don't like postal votes? ( non English )

They're as valid as an any other vote since the games are shown nationwide.

Re: PADDY JACKSON

Posted: Tue Dec 08, 2020 5:55 pm
by Neill_M
Challenge Cup

Sat Dec 12 2pm (UK Time) Agen v London Irish EPCR Website

European Professional Club Rugby | Live Streams (epcrugby.com)

Re: PADDY JACKSON

Posted: Wed Dec 09, 2020 10:39 am
by rumncoke
I see the Telegraph has a rather positive write up of Paddy — regarding his contribution on and off the field for LI and a semi- swipe at Guinness’s for their withdrawal of sponsorship.
Acknowledgement of his innocence and no mention of text messages - possible recognizing he only made one or two .

Is this the start of his much needed rehabilitation back into Irish Rugby and the providing the IRFU the opportunity they have the“cajones “ to face the ignorant libelous feminists .

Re: PADDY JACKSON

Posted: Wed Dec 09, 2020 11:21 am
by rumncoke
rumncoke wrote: Wed Dec 09, 2020 10:39 am I see the Telegraph has a rather positive write up of Paddy — regarding his contribution on and off the field for LI and a semi- swipe at Guinness’s for their withdrawal of sponsorship.
Acknowledgement of his innocence and no mention of text messages - possibly recognizing he only made one or two .

Is this the start of his much needed rehabilitation back into Irish Rugby and the providing the IRFU the opportunity of show they have the“cajones “ to face the ignorant libelous feminists .

Re: PADDY JACKSON

Posted: Wed Dec 09, 2020 12:39 pm
by Jackie Brown
rumncoke wrote: Wed Dec 09, 2020 10:39 am I see the Telegraph has a rather positive write up of Paddy — regarding his contribution on and off the field for LI and a semi- swipe at Guinness’s for their withdrawal of sponsorship.
Acknowledgement of his innocence and no mention of text messages - possible recognizing he only made one or two .

Is this the start of his much needed rehabilitation back into Irish Rugby and the providing the IRFU the opportunity they have the“cajones “ to face the ignorant libelous feminists .
Nope

Re: PADDY JACKSON

Posted: Wed Dec 09, 2020 4:20 pm
by Setanta
Unfortunately probably not. Note the difference in tone.

Re: PADDY JACKSON

Posted: Sun Dec 13, 2020 8:46 pm
by solidarity
Great win for LI. Paddy didn't play, so is he injured?