stickinout wrote:
1. So there's no state called the Republic of Ireland, I never knew that. Yet you're a republic, on the island of Ireland and are the only republic on the island but you're not called the Republic of Ireland? This is interesting and probably part of the lack of understanding i have. I thought Ireland saw itself as 32 counties until the 19th amendment and therefore up until 1999 didn't really recognise Northern Ireland? Do you not think it sounds a bit conceited that the country calls itself Ireland when the country was broken in two in 1922? It reminds me a bit of South Korea that likes to call itself Korea a lot of the time.
Technically the state didn't recognise Northern Ireland as it laid claim to the territory.The thing here is we all know this is a complex issue full of irrational bias and bitterness and finding the right time to have a referendum to remove the claim was always a tricky one until it could be put to people in simple terms, i.e remove the claim=peace in Northern Ireland or something quite close to this.In reality though the Govt of Ireland recognised Northern Ireland.
I wouldn't get too hung up on the Republic thing.There are lots of republics which don't use the word in their state name including The United States of America.
The thing is when the constitution was drafted they would still have had hopes, or pretended to, of claiming the counties which remained within the UK.Also, and I don't wish to labour this point, when people have fought long and hard for their independence I think they would feel an entitlement to name the country as they wish rather than what somebody else wishes.It is different now of course and we simply use the name that is the official state name.
stickinout wrote:
2. I have some friends here in Leinster who take offence at Ireland being called Eire. It's usually English people doing it and they don't mean to offend but it does. I have no idea why, what about down there in the Republic of
.
I'm afraid there are plenty of people within Éire who have no idea about anything.They most likely think the state is called Republic of Ireland and wouldn't know what Bunreacht na hÉireann even means.I'm afraid the people most open to offence are usually, if not always, the most ignorant.Some imbeciles think when English people say Éire they are referring to the Free State.In other words they think the English still refuse to recognise Ireland's independence and wish to cause us offence at every opportunity.What most of these individuals don't realise is that the majority of English people couldn't give a shíte.We have plenty of these down in my neck of the woods.To be honest Ireland has as many feckin idiots as anywhere else and one just has to treat them with as much indifference as possible.
stickinout wrote:
3. As for A na F being played, I would also be against people protesting at it being played but i'm also not for it being played. But like many Ulstermen for many years, we stand in respect of the anthem because we're in Dublin and because we're mostly reasonable people but it doesn't mean that we feel we belong. It's a sad state of affairs that the second most musical place on earth after Wales can't come up with something we can all buy in to.
I agree with you.There is really no logical reason why a good song cannot be adopted/penned etc which would keep the vast majority happy.Of course everytime I put forward the claims of "There is an Isle" I am shot down, usually by some Garryowen langer.
stickinout wrote:
4. I totally agree with you, if a pro can't get himself up for a game like France in Paris without hearing his National Anthem he should give the game up.
Thanks Shan for your frank answers, i learned something new today.
Thanks my honourable friend.It is always nice to be able to have a discussion without anybody getting too upset.In the light of my suggestion for a new rugby anthem I hope this won't change.
It is a man's own mind, not his enemy or foe, that lures him to evil ways.