Same question:Nothing wrong with the seeding system
It wasn't the seeding that was wrong
Can you provide information about the 'seeding system' Cap'n?
Moderator: Moderators
Same question:Nothing wrong with the seeding system
It wasn't the seeding that was wrong
Seeding system is simply to determine entry point. I believe that within each round, there was an open draw, so teams that enter at a particulr round CAN be drawn against one another. They don't get any other advantage other than later entry point.cables wrote:Entry point into the Cup competition cannot be the 'seeding system' referred to by Ball Boy.
Ball Boy's post seems to imply a 'seeding system' to remove real contenders prior to the final(s) and I would like to hear more about it.
Perhaps only Ball Boy CAN explain it. Perhaps UB have someone placed on a grassy knoll to pick off "real contenders"cables wrote:Our posts were at the same time so I repeat:
Entry point into the Cup competition cannot be the 'seeding system' referred to by Ball Boy.
Ball Boy's post seems to imply a 'seeding system' to remove real contenders prior to the final(s) and I would like to hear more about it.
Don't think you'll get one.cables wrote:Perhaps, still waiting for enlightenment on the 'seeding system' which produced this so called mismatch in the final however.
It could be argued that if they lost twice in 7 days (albeit to seeds), they weren't good enough anyway. Should they have expected a clear run in the Subsidiary?fox wrote: In one year a high seeded team (RSA?) played a seed in rd4 lost and picked up another seed in the subsidiary - lost. Think about that - a successful season finished in 7 days in a system that involves seeds. Madness.