Ulster v Munster

Talk about the men in white, and everything Ulster!!

Moderator: Moderators

User avatar
Surrey Red Hand
Warrior Assassin
Posts: 1265
Joined: Mon Apr 16, 2007 9:34 am
Location: Surrey/Herts

Re: Ulster v Munster

Post by Surrey Red Hand »

FFS calm down YM .. he has only had what 4 or 5 games, give him a chance - I'd be questioning McG's capability first

P*ssed off as much as anyone, MORE DRINK required then off to bed :cry:
Dublin4
Warrior Assassin
Posts: 1375
Joined: Fri Nov 13, 2009 5:42 pm

Re: Ulster v Munster

Post by Dublin4 »

what a boring game.
Straight out of the memory of 1970s and 1980s interpro rugby 6 3 type scorelines.
User avatar
Shan
Rí­ na Cúige Uladh
Posts: 11524
Joined: Mon Sep 24, 2007 6:55 pm
Location: Limerick

Re: Ulster v Munster

Post by Shan »

Dublin4 wrote:what a boring game.
Straight out of the memory of 1970s and 1980s interpro rugby 6 3 type scorelines.
It was raining all day in Belfast so hardly a surprise we didn't have a free flowing game.
It is a man's own mind, not his enemy or foe, that lures him to evil ways.
User avatar
Surrey Red Hand
Warrior Assassin
Posts: 1265
Joined: Mon Apr 16, 2007 9:34 am
Location: Surrey/Herts

Re: Ulster v Munster

Post by Surrey Red Hand »

YoungMan wrote:
Surrey Red Hand wrote:FFS calm down YM .. he has only had what 4 or 5 games, give him a chance - I'd be questioning McG's capability first

P*ssed off as much as anyone, MORE DRINK required then off to bed :cry:
Okay lets see how he does when we get beat in Cardiff ...................more wine :?
Now yer talking :drunken:

(un)fortunately I'll be there to witness the result - come what may :red:
Fly Half
Steward
Posts: 892
Joined: Mon Mar 06, 2006 2:42 pm
Location: Norn Irn

Re: Ulster v Munster

Post by Fly Half »

Pienaar hadn't a great game but he didn't cost Ulster the game either. AFAIK he was the only Ulster points scorer and his kicking % isn't any worse than NOC or iH in recent seasons.

Munster just about deserved to win because they can play smart rugby. Does anyone ask themselves why? Do Munster players have an innate rugby nous that Ulster don't? Of course not - they are coached that way!

IMO the criticism of the Ulster backs is a bit unfair, because Ulster made plenty of line breaks to create overlaps. So why didn't they score? IMO most of the players have been coached with a far too defensive mindset and so are more concerned with defending space rather than supporting breaks. I can't understand the ongoing love affair with the miss pass either. At times Ulster are so keen to get it wide they negate their overlap by spinning it wide too soon and so allowing the inside defence to cover the mismatch.

I don't blame Pienaar or Humphreys for the last try either. It was really lucky for Dineen that the ball popped up for him and if Humphreys had been able to ship it to Marshall Ulster could have won the game. Ulster again lost this game in the first half in what was a maybe a 10 point wind. Why they don't drop goals is beyond me.
The future isn't what it used to be
King Ding
Squire
Posts: 618
Joined: Thu Apr 24, 2008 6:11 pm
Location: The back end of No where

Re: Ulster v Munster

Post by King Ding »

even after the last few bad years, i still think tonight was a new low for ulster, how we lost that game is beyond me :banghead: As for our south africans atm muller is looking like the only good buy. How someone who is wannenburgs size cant make ground going forward is beyond me and before i am told he was marked out of the game im not talking from set moves, the amount of times he hit a man one on one and was either was driven back or stopped dead in his tracks was ridiculous.
As for peinaar i don't wana be to harsh on the guy, but how can someone who has 40+ caps, and kicked for them, not get one from in front of the sticks, I humph often gets critised for his temperament, but peinaars i dare say is worse when it comes to kicking, not even just at goal, kicking to touch he missed a few too and we only got away with it because of poor return kicks from munster. His general play was OK apart from one dodgy pass to humph iirc, but if good scrumhalf play is all we were going to get from him, why didn't we spend his rather sizeable pay cheque on a specialist SH.
As for the rest of the team no real stand out performances, although mention should be given to gerry cronin who was v good for a first cap, really solidified the scrum, one for ulster to keep a hold off, thought tuohy did well when he came on and humph had a decent game until the last play.

A long hard look in the mirror is required by the coachs and team, i just hope this downward spiral doesn't continue.
King Ding
Squire
Posts: 618
Joined: Thu Apr 24, 2008 6:11 pm
Location: The back end of No where

Re: Ulster v Munster

Post by King Ding »

Fly Half wrote:Pienaar hadn't a great game but he didn't cost Ulster the game either. AFAIK he was the only Ulster points scorer and his kicking % isn't any worse than NOC or iH in recent seasons.
Have to pick up on this point, maybe his kicking % isn't as bad but this is probably due to the fact he hasn't been taking on the really hard ones, if NOC or iHumph missed that last kick they would be heavily critised and they would deserve to be, its bread and butter stuff for a kicker and just causes hes a big name doesn't mean he shouldn't be critised the same as others.
User avatar
mikerob
Lord Chancellor
Posts: 9128
Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 7:50 pm
Location: Chiswick, London

Re: Ulster v Munster

Post by mikerob »

I don't recall that many Ulster line breaks.

Michael Bradley was a studio pundit for BBC NI. OK, he isn't the world's greatest coach but he was saying the Ulster backs were going too wide, too soon, too many times.
bootlaced
Lord Chancellor
Posts: 4266
Joined: Fri May 21, 2010 6:23 pm
Location: Back Home

Re: Ulster v Munster

Post by bootlaced »

Hump for me showed tonight why I don't rate him,he is a glory hunter,he likes to get the adulation,and as long as he looks good he is happy,whereas NOC is a team player,we are losing at the moment with Humps,time to bring NOC back into the fold,at least he is a team player.Pienaar needs a kick up the backside and needs to be reminded that he is being paid a lot of money to be more than a 50/50 kicker,not to fumble at the back of a scrum or ruck,not to throw wayward passes,and the kicking duties should be taken off him,but then again the coaches should also take some of the blame,we are now looking at our comfort zone at around 7/8 in the league at the end of the season.
"Never whistle while you're pi$$ing", Hagbard Celine
King Ding
Squire
Posts: 618
Joined: Thu Apr 24, 2008 6:11 pm
Location: The back end of No where

Re: Ulster v Munster

Post by King Ding »

bootlaced wrote:Hump for me showed tonight why I don't rate him,he is a glory hunter,he likes to get the adulation,and as long as he looks good he is happy,whereas NOC is a team player,we are losing at the moment with Humps,time to bring NOC back into the fold,at least he is a team player.
OK he didn't have a great game, but NOC being there would have been worse for us, humph at least kicked the corners reasonably well and im assuming these glory moments are the kicks and runs he took for himself, at the least when humoh does these hes doing them to try and attack and break the line, whereas when NOV does these things it creates nothing apart from mumbles in the crowd.
bootlaced
Lord Chancellor
Posts: 4266
Joined: Fri May 21, 2010 6:23 pm
Location: Back Home

Re: Ulster v Munster

Post by bootlaced »

He is still a glory hunter though,and I'm sure NOC could have kicked those lines just as well,and talking of lines where was the markings anyway,no white lines anywhere :scratch:
"Never whistle while you're pi$$ing", Hagbard Celine
User avatar
Cap'n Grumpy
Rí­ na Cúige Uladh
Posts: 15704
Joined: Thu Aug 14, 2008 4:21 pm
Location: second barrier up, at the half-way line ... or is the third?

Re: Ulster v Munster

Post by Cap'n Grumpy »

bootlaced wrote:He is still a glory hunter though,and I'm sure NOC could have kicked those lines just as well,and talking of lines where was the markings anyway,no white lines anywhere :scratch:
Let me guess?

Maybe that wet stuff that fell out of the sky for the past 24 hours and flooded the roads etc had someting to do with it :scratch:
I'm not arguing -
I'm just explaining why I'm right
King Ding
Squire
Posts: 618
Joined: Thu Apr 24, 2008 6:11 pm
Location: The back end of No where

Re: Ulster v Munster

Post by King Ding »

bootlaced wrote:He is still a glory hunter though,and I'm sure NOC could have kicked those lines just as well,and talking of lines where was the markings anyway,no white lines anywhere :scratch:
Your entitled to your opinion but i still don't buy it, the grubbers to the corners were good play and Humphs defence was actually v good tonight.
User avatar
Jackie Brown
Rí­ na Cúige Uladh
Posts: 11723
Joined: Sat Jun 11, 2005 1:15 pm
Location: Carrickfergus

Re: Ulster v Munster

Post by Jackie Brown »

Humph had a good game and was not the reason why we are tom kite.

Do our Coaches do anything all week, cause it doesn't look like it. I have never been so despondant leaving Ravenhill. PIenaar couldn't kick my granny. Don't be fooled, that was a poor Munster performance tonight. Stringer was gash and their fullback was kack, yet as a team we couldn't pick up on this. We run laterally, can't work out how to score. we miss first up tackles but our hands were improved tonight but we had no ideas. Do our coaches have a game plan? Humph can kick the corners as proved tonight, yet instead of sticking with it we throw it wide to early, run laterally, kick when we should run, run when we should kick. The decision making and ideas are poor. McIlwaine is a fullback, play him there or stick him on the bench. Marshall and Spence both have loads of potential, especially Spence, so play them in their positions. D'Arcy trys hard but lacks expeience when making decisions, that'll come in time.

Falloon looked like he hadn't played in weeks, Diack was effective yet pulled ashore on 60mins, Pedrie is a lot of bark and no bite. Muller trys harder than anyone and really needs to knock seven lumps of tom kite out of the rest of them, Barker and Tuohy were both effective. PaddyMac again was noticeable but feck, Hayes did him over in the Scrums which is embarrassing. Brady had a good game and Young played no better than I expected. It doesn't take a team like Munster long to realise that 95% of our lineouts are thrown to one player.

One final point, the Ulster branch in their wisedom have now decided to lock the gates out onto ravenhill Park Gardens! WHY?? Surely H&S wise it is CRAZY to funnel everyone from the Prom, STand and approx 1/4-1/5 of the Terrace who leave via the Aquinas end through the Memorial Arch.

Nothing surprises me about the Ulster BRanch though, the money for Pienaar would have been better spent on a coaching team who knew what they were doing. Few of us were fooled by the scrapped wins against poor opposition at the start of the season.
Gonna Party Like It's 1999
User avatar
fuzzylogic
Lord Chancellor
Posts: 4592
Joined: Sun Feb 10, 2008 4:40 pm

Re: Ulster v Munster

Post by fuzzylogic »

by Jackie Brown » Fri Oct 29, 2010 9:34 pm

PaddyMac again was noticeable but feck, Hayes did him over in the Scrums which is embarrassing.
I agree with nearly everything you say Jackie but that part is just taking the pi$h!!!

John Hayes - 36 years old, 102 Ireland Caps, 2 Lions Caps and 185 Munster Caps. Paddy McAllister 21 years old with 8 Ulster caps.

You are the only one who should be embarassed tonight making a statement like that!!!!
Mary had a little lamb . . .
Post Reply