Ulster V Glasgow
Moderator: Moderators
Re: Ulster V Glasgow
by the by, i have a spare ticket for sale for friday night if anyone wants a seat in the memorial end (section 2). send me a direct message if so.
Re: Ulster V Glasgow
If they play like they did last Friday I would imagine there'll be a few more posts like this over the coming weeksaarons wrote:by the by, i have a spare ticket for sale for friday night if anyone wants a seat in the memorial end (section 2). send me a direct message if so.
-
- Lord Chancellor
- Posts: 5046
- Joined: Sat Oct 30, 2010 6:16 pm
- Location: The Dufferin
Re: Ulster V Glasgow
Because he started on Friday night?Thelaw wrote:How the hell is Roger the Incumbent - one match where he payed like the invisible man? Nick will start.CIMANFOREVER wrote:FNW should bench; RW is incumbent- up to FNW to retake it on form rather than reputation. BTW- both 8's have a try apiece so far....
Nick didn't do much more against Leinster I recall, apart from barrelling over from 5 metres. And my o my, didn't RW break nicely up the blindside when Beagle was marked absent. Puzzling for an 8 who doesn't do much other than shore up the base of a scrum..
Exterminate all rational thought
Re: Ulster V Glasgow
ciman
One run doesn't justify his place , if he lacks FNW ability to either cross the line or absorb three defenders.
FNM just brings more to the party simple never mind who is current 8 by default
Diack did more last week than Wilson both in the line out and loose.
One run doesn't justify his place , if he lacks FNW ability to either cross the line or absorb three defenders.
FNM just brings more to the party simple never mind who is current 8 by default
Diack did more last week than Wilson both in the line out and loose.
Within this carapace of skepticism there lives an optimist
Re: Ulster V Glasgow
First time in a long time its not gonna be a sell out?
You've got to get your first tackle in early, even if it's late.
-
- Lord Chancellor
- Posts: 5046
- Joined: Sat Oct 30, 2010 6:16 pm
- Location: The Dufferin
Re: Ulster V Glasgow
Rummie, basically, we'll see, as RW's fitness increases. To continue the cliche, they are entirely different in many aspects. So a lot is comparing apples and oranges. For the Diack line out example, include Nick as well.. I don't have downer on Nick, far from it, but neither do I get the writing off of Wilson as a benchwarmer when Nick needs a (frequent) break. There are more aspects to 8 play, and in many areas Wilson is superior tactically, positionally and in terms of the basic 8 skills. NW's style can and will be analysed to death this season, and may, in all probability, be negated against the bigger sides. Remember the dream team back row of Ferris, Heaslip and SOB against Wales in the WC Quarter?- all chopped low and hard, game over. So he will have to adapt his game, or we will need both Plan A and B. RW offers that option. Nick offers something extra in broken play, but RW offers more in a tight corner, all things being equal (i.e. the rest of the side turning up...)rumncoke wrote:ciman
One run doesn't justify his place , if he lacks FNW ability to either cross the line or absorb three defenders.
FNM just brings more to the party simple never mind who is current 8 by default
Diack did more last week than Wilson both in the line out and loose.
Exterminate all rational thought
Re: Ulster V Glasgow
There are already 2,000 more tickets sold than for the same match last year, Pip, and there should be about 11,000 at the match, so it's actually pretty good.pip14 wrote:First time in a long time its not gonna be a sell out?
Bo***cks to Brexit
-
- Novice
- Posts: 23
- Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2011 3:06 pm
Re: Ulster V Glasgow
Porter and Allen to start apparantly
Re: Ulster V Glasgow
And yet he has been dropped/rotated. Really can't understand that.rumncoke wrote: Diack did more last week than Wilson both in the line out and loose.
STATE PRO VIRIS ULTONIAE
Re: Ulster V Glasgow
Ruckster I am not sitting here and listening to how good Glasgow are.ruckover wrote:bazzaj wrote:If we perform we win-its that simple.
Bazz, could you not apply that to every match?
As for the rest of your post, it is nothing short of complete and utter madness. Glasgow were the form side in all of Europe in 2013 and the conditions they played in against Cardiff were far from ideal. I'm not surprised it was only a 7 point gap between the two teams. We'll do well to get a win out of this. Very well indeed.
I am convinced we have better players and that Glasgow side you on about are equally /more weakened arguably than we are shorn of their top players.
Look at our back row, they cant live with that on our day and thats a going to be what will give us the edge.
For me if both sides play to their optimum we are the better side.
Thats the IF though.
Look for your win.
Re: Ulster V Glasgow
Yes scrum but factor in we are at home with NW, Cave and Hendo to come back in, 3 massive players for last season in terms of our organisation and power game.scrum5 wrote:bazzaj to apply your own logic to the argument, look at the team we failed to beat on Friday......bazzaj wrote:Need our strongest side out.
Snipes team with Nick Williams is it.
As for Glasgow they are not the All Blacks.
Looked at the team that scraped a home win against the unmighty Cardiff and if its along those lines against us its certainly not worth getting our knickers in a twist about.
Matawalus out injured which is a big miss for them and I would be a lot more concerned if he played as he was the best 9 in the league last season.
If we perform we win-its that simple.
The Dragons game most of us knew would be a struggle with them at home for their first game and the team we fielded but this is different circumstances entirely.
All that considered I am backing us to perform well which can only lead to a victory.
Re: Ulster V Glasgow
The team then...possibly?
Payne, Trimble, Cave, Marshall L, Allen, Jackson, Porter, Black, Herring, Fitzpatrick, Muller, Tuohy, Williams, Doyle, Wilson.
Replacements: Court, Annett, Lutton, Henderson, Henry, Marshall P, McKinney, McIlwaine.
Payne, Trimble, Cave, Marshall L, Allen, Jackson, Porter, Black, Herring, Fitzpatrick, Muller, Tuohy, Williams, Doyle, Wilson.
Replacements: Court, Annett, Lutton, Henderson, Henry, Marshall P, McKinney, McIlwaine.
You've got to get your first tackle in early, even if it's late.
Re: Ulster V Glasgow
I'd have Farrell over McIlwaine on the bench Pip, however I could see with McIlwaine's ability to cover every back position he would be preferred as a 23 option. Apart from that, looks like the team.
You haven't seen me at my best yet. Let's be honest, you probably never will.
Re: Ulster V Glasgow
Ciman.
As previously stated my preferred backrow in the absence of FNW and Ferris would be Henderson Henry and Diack
Wilson on the bench . Henderson provides a ball carrier Diack an alternative in the lineout and support in the midfield and Henry is the ferret in the ruck.
Wilson has never been a ball carrier, nor a lineout jumper it is not what Wilson does which makes me omit him it is the fact that others seem to bring something additional to the table.
As previously stated my preferred backrow in the absence of FNW and Ferris would be Henderson Henry and Diack
Wilson on the bench . Henderson provides a ball carrier Diack an alternative in the lineout and support in the midfield and Henry is the ferret in the ruck.
Wilson has never been a ball carrier, nor a lineout jumper it is not what Wilson does which makes me omit him it is the fact that others seem to bring something additional to the table.
Within this carapace of skepticism there lives an optimist
- Snipe Watson
- Rí na Cúige Uladh
- Posts: 23443
- Joined: Mon Sep 08, 2008 6:42 pm
Re: Ulster V Glasgow
This dropping Chris Henry thing is madness.