Moderator: Moderators
Indeed. Like tomorrow night's selection. So far from ulsterrugby.com we have:Jackie Brown wrote:If we were relying on the official ulster website to keep us updated we'd be waiting a long long time for very little info.
Now Yin, I'm not going to call you a clown on your first working day of 2014, instead I'll mention the McGlock affair and allow you to reconsider that line.OneMore wrote:
Maybe publishing information before it goes on ulsterrugby.com is actually no big deal to anyone who matters?
Baggy, are you suggesting the culprits behind the McGlock mess were they who reported that he wasn't being kept? Or maybe was it more that it was dreadfully handled by those in charge?BaggyTrousers wrote:Now Yin, I'm not going to call you a clown on your first working day of 2014, instead I'll mention the McGlock affair and allow you to reconsider that line.OneMore wrote:
Maybe publishing information before it goes on ulsterrugby.com is actually no big deal to anyone who matters?
Pip pip, you've been helped.
Of course non+'d but Yin doesn't worry about such things. Of coure these things are generally harmless however there are times when this is not the case as the McGlock affair adequately demonstrated.nonplussed wrote:Maybe it was leaked by a disgruntled hanger on who didnt like the new regime. interesting it was leaked when logan was on holiday!
Right, let's get this straight. In the scenario where someone leaks information to the press, and the press publish it, we're saying that the press were the guilty party here, not the one who leaked the information?BaggyTrousers wrote:Of course non+'d but Yin doesn't worry about such things. Of coure these things are generally harmless however there are times when this is not the case as the McGlock affair adequately demonstrated.nonplussed wrote:Maybe it was leaked by a disgruntled hanger on who didnt like the new regime. interesting it was leaked when logan was on holiday!
Still not going to call yin a clown mind you, just innocent.
If he was welsh, we'd have no option but to burn him..........Cornerfleg wrote:It could be worse - we could be Welsh!
What about a scenario where ALL the press are given a story with an agreement that they can ALL use it on or after a certain date, but one journo jumps the gun?OneMore wrote:Right, let's get this straight. In the scenario where someone leaks information to the press, and the press publish it, we're saying that the press were the guilty party here, not the one who leaked the information?
Seems to me a bizarre way of seeing things. But hey ho, we're all different I suppose.
