Page 8 of 8

Re: Manchester

Posted: Sun May 28, 2017 8:25 pm
by Snipe Watson
Rooster wrote:
Snipe Watson wrote:
big mervyn wrote:
Cockatrice wrote:I don't like religious fanatics and whilst I have met my fair share of muslims most of whom are lovely people many I wouldn't trust as far as I could lift Robbie Diack.. sad but true and based on contact not reading a book or what some academic told me based on his reading..

Some of those I knew best where amongst the biggest hypocrites who could ever wish to meet.. the DUP has some as well.
I know 2 Muslims well. One is fairly secular and is a bit of a Delboy - he'd buy you and sell you. The other is very religious and I'd trust him with my life and/or my life savings.
So you'd send 50% of Muslims to the shap then? >EW
I wouldn't trust 100% of Free Presbyterians to go to the shap for me
You could send Mervyn's sound Muslim to keep an eye on the Free P.

Re: Manchester

Posted: Sun May 28, 2017 9:05 pm
by Rooster
Snipe Watson wrote:
Rooster wrote:
Snipe Watson wrote:
big mervyn wrote:
Cockatrice wrote:I don't like religious fanatics and whilst I have met my fair share of muslims most of whom are lovely people many I wouldn't trust as far as I could lift Robbie Diack.. sad but true and based on contact not reading a book or what some academic told me based on his reading..

Some of those I knew best where amongst the biggest hypocrites who could ever wish to meet.. the DUP has some as well.
I know 2 Muslims well. One is fairly secular and is a bit of a Delboy - he'd buy you and sell you. The other is very religious and I'd trust him with my life and/or my life savings.
So you'd send 50% of Muslims to the shap then? >EW
I wouldn't trust 100% of Free Presbyterians to go to the shap for me
You could send Mervyn's sound Muslim to keep an eye on the Free P.
He would finish up radicalised :shock:

Re: Manchester

Posted: Tue May 30, 2017 11:43 am
by pwrmoore
Interesting piece in the independent

HERE

Re: Manchester

Posted: Tue May 30, 2017 11:27 pm
by Cockatrice
Some 4000 staff not all operational with supposedly over 3000 targets to assess I suspect a mistake was made and I also suspect that they will make further ones.. never as joined up as one would hope and the terrorist thinks..

Re: Manchester

Posted: Wed May 31, 2017 4:47 am
by Dave
Under resourced following years of Tory austerity and yet trident gets renewed. The media seem to blame Corbyn. I wonder which nuclear powers are waiting for the day that the UK doesn't renew trident to eviscerate it.

I also read that the FBI specifically warned MI5 about Abedi. If he was on a watch list of a few thousand he should have been fairly high up it, also considering he had not long returned from Libya.

Re: Manchester

Posted: Wed May 31, 2017 10:10 am
by Cockatrice
Dave wrote:Under resourced following years of Tory austerity and yet trident gets renewed. The media seem to blame Corbyn. I wonder which nuclear powers are waiting for the day that the UK doesn't renew trident to eviscerate it.

I also read that the FBI specifically warned MI5 about Abedi. If he was on a watch list of a few thousand he should have been fairly high up it, also considering he had not long returned from Libya.
Probably some poor little analysts that can't follow the coloured lines on his software program or it is sitting in a pile of paper still waiting to be fed into said computer... they are recruiting but it is a hard gig to get and recruitment can take a very long time..