Page 9 of 52

Re: PADDY JACKSON

Posted: Fri Jun 07, 2019 8:46 pm
by richardt84
https://www.google.co.uk/amp/s/amp.belf ... 91723.html

Not only were they guilty of a hypocritical set of perceived moral standards in releasing their statement it turns out the decision had nothing to do with Jackson as the was made before May.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Re: PADDY JACKSON

Posted: Fri Jun 07, 2019 9:43 pm
by Dave
I have no words...

What utter, utter Warren Gatland!

Re: PADDY JACKSON

Posted: Fri Jun 07, 2019 11:35 pm
by justinr73
rumncoke wrote:My guess ,as Li have stated cash converters had with drawn sponsorship before Paddy was signed , but to claim it was because of the his signing gives them some free publicity.

It being not worth Paddy’s time to sue — better to let sleeping dogs lie— than to awake the bitches





Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Even a stopped clock.....

Re: PADDY JACKSON

Posted: Sat Jun 08, 2019 7:20 am
by Setanta
You have to give the blame also to rugbypass and the other media outlets that posted it, knowing it had no foundation. Bit like Brexit.

Re: PADDY JACKSON

Posted: Sat Jun 08, 2019 9:06 am
by TopPoster
mote Top Balls from London Irish to call out moral bullsh!t from an immoral company, would have been cherry on cake to point out Paddy didn’t make any of those private encrypted messages that Cash Grabbers re-tweeted. Would be an entire bake off if some institution called out the slut name calling from the complainant and her coincidence private messages made between her and her friends a few weeks before the incident discussing how they would blackmail someone over rape. All in the official public domain but conveniently brushed under the carpet.

I’m liking LI more and more, only over an hour from me and when they finally move back to London will likely adopt them as my aviva team.

Re: PADDY JACKSON

Posted: Mon Jun 10, 2019 10:34 am
by Neill_M
https://extra.ie/2019/06/10/blind/now-g ... irish-move

Diageo apparently have "serious concerns" about LI signing Paddy. We will see how accurate it is after the Loan Sharks' fake moral outrage etc

Re: PADDY JACKSON

Posted: Mon Jun 10, 2019 11:26 am
by Jackie Brown
Lol, a drinks company being our moral guardians.

Sent from my Pixel 2 using Tapatalk

Re: PADDY JACKSON

Posted: Mon Jun 10, 2019 11:29 am
by Wee Woman
Neill_M wrote:https://extra.ie/2019/06/10/blind/now-g ... irish-move

Diageo apparently have "serious concerns" about LI signing Paddy. We will see how accurate it is after the Loan Sharks' fake moral outrage etc
Head of sponsorship Dublin based, say no more.



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Re: PADDY JACKSON

Posted: Mon Jun 10, 2019 1:03 pm
by Dublin4
Wee Woman
You are unfair to suggest some kind of anti paddy bias from Dublin. All local fans I know wish him well with LI. He doesn't deserve this harassment from sponsors at all. Especially the drinks industry.

Re: PADDY JACKSON

Posted: Mon Jun 10, 2019 1:56 pm
by Wee Woman
Dublin4 wrote:Wee Woman
You are unfair to suggest some kind of anti paddy bias from Dublin. All local fans I know wish him well with LI. He doesn't deserve this harassment from sponsors at all. Especially the drinks industry.
I’m not suggesting that at all, although I am hinting at the bulk of the feminist brigade hailing from the South and having created enough noise last time out to influence Dublin based sponsors (BOI being the most prominent)

I know most even minded folk from the South support Paddy & that is welcome.




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Re: PADDY JACKSON

Posted: Mon Jun 10, 2019 3:04 pm
by Dublin4
I can agree that feminists down here climbed on the bandwagon and helped put pressure on the sponsors. But I think your own local feminists are just as involved.
Wherever they come from they are not interested in rugby or rugby players and are just pushing an agenda.

Re: PADDY JACKSON

Posted: Mon Jun 10, 2019 3:06 pm
by Wee Woman
Dublin4 wrote:I can agree that feminists down here climbed on the bandwagon and helped put pressure on the sponsors. But I think your own local feminists are just as involved.
Wherever they come from they are not interested in rugby or rugby players and are just pushing an agenda.
Totally agree & as someone who used to work in the drinks industry I’m disappointed to see Diageo doing this at this stage.

Can’t see LI rolling over though & that’s great.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Re: PADDY JACKSON

Posted: Mon Jun 10, 2019 3:34 pm
by shamalicious
Not seeing any LI sponsors up in arms about "pissgate"...

Sent from my SM-G960F using Tapatalk

Re: PADDY JACKSON

Posted: Mon Jun 10, 2019 3:45 pm
by Setanta
Cancel rugbypass immediately.

Re: PADDY JACKSON

Posted: Mon Jun 10, 2019 4:32 pm
by rumncoke
Pot - Kettle comes quickly to mind

Since drink would be involved in most domestic abuse cases to which the police are called

I’m surprise such a morally minded Club as Li would have anything to do with a Company which sells human misery


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk