Re: Mike Ross
Posted: Thu Apr 13, 2017 8:23 pm
Does Mike Ross even want to be a coach? Maybe he plans to open his own cafe.
It was this that put the idea in my head:Dave wrote:Does Mike Ross even want to be a coach? Maybe he plans to open his own cafe.
http://www.the42.ie/mike-ross-darkness- ... 0-Apr2017/“I’ve an interest in coaching so that could be a possibility and I’ve a big interest in the tech space. I’m also looking at maybe doing some further education whether it’s a full-time or part-time masters.”
"Especially if he only knows how to coach tightheads" was a joke.Amiga500 wrote:I'd imagine he'd be very well versed in the stroke/counterstroke that goes on between tight and loose in the scrum.Snipe Watson wrote:Especially if he only knows how to coach tightheads.
The thing that stands out to me is that he could scrummage right now and be (very) competitive at it. I've been told that the best way to know what is going on in any given scrum is actually to be in it - since I've no idea myself I have to take that at face value.
So, to me, it wouldn't be as if Ross could only stand on the training pitch and try to view whats happening (as per 99% of scrum coaches in the world) - he could get into the scrum and feel whats really going on with all players under real pressure. It could be a short (but great) window of opportunity for us.
Was?Rooster wrote:Reggie Corrigan was a decent scrum coach
And a notably intelligent player.Rooster wrote:Reggie Corrigan was a decent scrum coach
As in was while he was at Ulster , I'm sure he is still good but no longer coaching UlsterRuss wrote:Was?Rooster wrote:Reggie Corrigan was a decent scrum coach
Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
Was he actually on the books here or just doing some sessional free lance work?Rooster wrote:As in was while he was at Ulster , I'm sure he is still good but no longer coaching UlsterRuss wrote:Was?Rooster wrote:Reggie Corrigan was a decent scrum coach
Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
Sometimes its hard to know where sarcasm stops and stupidity starts...Snipe Watson wrote: "Especially if he only knows how to coach tightheads" was a joke.
Suppose I should have thrown in an emoji or two.Amiga500 wrote:Sometimes its hard to know where sarcasm stops and stupidity starts...Snipe Watson wrote: "Especially if he only knows how to coach tightheads" was a joke.
And the tight.rumncoke wrote:I don't understand this fuss about coaches and a scrum coach especially while we haven't dominated the set piece like Leinster I can't remember to many occasions when the Ulster scrums has been dominated and held its own in the set piece.
Where Ulster are weak is the loose and I can't for the life of me figure how a scrum coach is going to improve the loose play of forwards .
But then there is this fnn frame of mind that everything is solved by coaches -- for the love of use your brains its a back row that Ulster need not a scrum coach.
Don't feed the trolltherealspratt wrote:And the tight.rumncoke wrote:I don't understand this fuss about coaches and a scrum coach especially while we haven't dominated the set piece like Leinster I can't remember to many occasions when the Ulster scrums has been dominated and held its own in the set piece.
Where Ulster are weak is the loose and I can't for the life of me figure how a scrum coach is going to improve the loose play of forwards .
But then there is this fnn frame of mind that everything is solved by coaches -- for the love of use your brains its a back row that Ulster need not a scrum coach.