Attack and defence.shamalicious wrote:Can anyone suggest what the problems are with this squad?
Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Moderator: Moderators
Attack and defence.shamalicious wrote:Can anyone suggest what the problems are with this squad?
Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk
The ref was not the reason for losing that match.Samstew wrote:The referee put them in the position where by they could push on and win, he only started picking up on their indiscretions when the game was won.Deraless wrote:At least we can't complain about being robbed by the ref. We can complain about being robbed by our own ineptitude and lack of skill/brains/execution/aggression etc.
Can't see any positive from this whatsoever other than it's nearly over.
Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
Where Ulster poor because they were chasing the game, you can compete against another 15 , but you can never beat the ref, he was very poor.
+ discipline, skills, gameplan, wit, recruitment, academy, management, conditioning, and Nucifucofski.kingofthehill wrote:Attack and defence.shamalicious wrote:Can anyone suggest what the problems are with this squad?
Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
My kneejerk reaction is sack all the imports and spend their wages on development.Russ wrote:UR needs a long hard look at itself and what it means to play for them
Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
kingofthehill wrote:The ref was not the reason for losing that match.Samstew wrote:The referee put them in the position where by they could push on and win, he only started picking up on their indiscretions when the game was won.Deraless wrote:At least we can't complain about being robbed by the ref. We can complain about being robbed by our own ineptitude and lack of skill/brains/execution/aggression etc.
Can't see any positive from this whatsoever other than it's nearly over.
Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
Where Ulster poor because they were chasing the game, you can compete against another 15 , but you can never beat the ref, he was very poor.
No, he wasn't the reason, but he played as big a part as the players.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
The don’t know what they are doing. They play between the two 15m channels. It’s schoolboy stuff.Deraless wrote:Maybe overly simplistic but to be successful you need either great players or players who play as a team and become greater than the sum of their parts like 2016 Connacht.
We certainly don't have enough from column A even at tip-top strength. At the minute most of them look like they are not playing together. Pack making runs into isolation. Effort in the first half was good but back row was absolutely schooled. Second half was as bad as it gets. Probably ran out of steam again with all the tackles.
Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
The disallowed try was a massive momentum moment, no question. However the first 35 minutes of the second half were absolute dross. Went to empty the dishwasher for the last 5 and studio comments. Trying out a new brand of dishwasher pods this week, couldn't wait to see how good a job they had done. They were half price in Sainsbury's lovely lemony smell in the kitchen.kingofthehill wrote:The ref was not the reason for losing that match.Samstew wrote:The referee put them in the position where by they could push on and win, he only started picking up on their indiscretions when the game was won.Deraless wrote:At least we can't complain about being robbed by the ref. We can complain about being robbed by our own ineptitude and lack of skill/brains/execution/aggression etc.
Can't see any positive from this whatsoever other than it's nearly over.
Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
Where Ulster poor because they were chasing the game, you can compete against another 15 , but you can never beat the ref, he was very poor.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk