The UAFC

for dog and ulcer wrote: ↑Sun Dec 18, 2022 3:03 pm

Cap'n Grumpy wrote: ↑Sun Dec 18, 2022 3:00 pm

for dog and ulcer wrote: ↑Sun Dec 18, 2022 2:48 pm

Cap'n Grumpy wrote: ↑Sun Dec 18, 2022 1:02 pm I think we should call for a public inquiry into this omnishambles.

Tis the Ulster way, after all.

Will take ten years to be granted, another 5 to gather evidence, 5 more for the appointed Judge to come to his conclusions and write report, another 3 years while it's decided if it can be published in full, or partially redacted to protect the guilty, 5 more years of legal action while one side insists on full publication, and others calling for it to be suppressed for another 30 years.

After all that, we reject the findings and take another 10 years of legal action and threats until another public inquiry is promised. That will be followed by 8 years of wrangling over the remit of the inquiry, and why the first one was flawed. While that will never be fully ascertained, another 5 years will be taken up with 4 people agreeing in turn to conduct the inquiry before resigning for some obscure reason, (one of who will be Shane Logan who , according to his CV, was "called to the bar" during his time at Ulster, and who now claims this makes him an expert not only in law but peoples' rights to drink responsibly.

Finally after a further 20 years the report will be published with 3 people standing outside the Supreme court in London claiming vindication and that Ulster should now be named as Heiny Champions 2023.

LAR who actually were crowned champions that year start their own legal action to have that overturned, finally winning their action after another 30 years, by which time . . . . what was the question in the first place?

Very good. Sounds about right although lacking the detail of the legal costs and how much the lawyers make.

Apologies - I assumed that anyone from Norn Iron would know that costs and lawyers would amount to millions out of anything relating to law and/or public inquiries.

Allegedly.

Cap'n Grumpy wrote:

Dave wrote: ↑Sun Dec 18, 2022 2:57 pm

Cap'n Grumpy wrote:

Dave wrote: ↑Sun Dec 18, 2022 1:20 pm

Cap'n Grumpy wrote: Pay attention buster -

He asked you to tell him they weren't allowed at the match.

I read it too fast. In my defence nobody told me what speed to read it at.

In future read things TWICE to avoid errors.

If you miss things first time around, there's always Dave ja Vu.

I thought that's what it's there for????

Four question marks!!!! You are very curious.

Not really - I just thought one was obliged to show repeats on Dave and Dave Ja Vu.

Wasn't sure how many repeats - although I'm pretty certain 3 ain't enough.

Cap'n Grumpy wrote: ↑Sun Dec 18, 2022 2:32 pm

Deraless wrote: ↑Sun Dec 18, 2022 2:20 pm Sack "The Dish".
Logan IN

Pedantry alert, the dish only has one 'e' - it doesn't have an 'e' at the end.


But when you wrote "Logan IN", I knew you were either drunk or attempting humour to comfort us in our pain.

justinr73 wrote:Tigers had a strong looking side out too.

We were extremely unlucky with the draw this year but feck it.

Let’s fight our battles on one front this season.