Can I have a poppy and 1916 on my boots?HwoodMike2umate wrote:And with regard to the boots, for all you lot know his Great Grandad maybe fought at the Somme.
Will the southern bigots allow it?
Moderator: Moderators
Can I have a poppy and 1916 on my boots?HwoodMike2umate wrote:And with regard to the boots, for all you lot know his Great Grandad maybe fought at the Somme.
Bet none of them have political messages on their bootsNeill_M wrote:Wales Team: Liam Williams; Alex Cuthbert, Jonathan Davies, Jamie Roberts, George North; Dan Biggar, Gareth Davies; Rob Evans, Scott Baldwin, Samson Lee, Bradley Davies, Alun Wyn Jones, Dan Lydiate, Sam Warburton (capt), Taulupe Faletau.
Replacements: Ken Owens, Paul James, Tomas Francis, Luke Charteris, Justin Tipuric, Rhys Webb, Rhys Priestland, Gareth Anscombe.
1690 is part of our history, but i am sure someone would not be allowed to express itBR wrote:Not remotely possible in Ireland or anywhere else.Russ wrote:I wish the Irish could keep politics out of sport
Very sad to see Ian Madigan cannot move on
Don't care what Madigan wears at the RDS. It's part (a selective part) of his nation's history. I'd like to think he would have a wee bit more decorum than to wear them in Ireland duty.
Only the bigots get to express their historyKofi Annan wrote:1690 is part of our history, but i am sure someone would not be allowed to express itBR wrote:Not remotely possible in Ireland or anywhere else.Russ wrote:I wish the Irish could keep politics out of sport
Very sad to see Ian Madigan cannot move on
Don't care what Madigan wears at the RDS. It's part (a selective part) of his nation's history. I'd like to think he would have a wee bit more decorum than to wear them in Ireland duty.
No, but then history in this statelet is especially divisive. Elsewhere it has been airbrushed with romanticism.Kofi Annan wrote:1690 is part of our history, but i am sure someone would not be allowed to express itBR wrote:Not remotely possible in Ireland or anywhere else.Russ wrote:I wish the Irish could keep politics out of sport
Very sad to see Ian Madigan cannot move on
Don't care what Madigan wears at the RDS. It's part (a selective part) of his nation's history. I'd like to think he would have a wee bit more decorum than to wear them in Ireland duty.
One man's terrorist is another man's terroristBR wrote:No, but then history in this statelet is especially divisive. Elsewhere it has been airbrushed with romanticism.Kofi Annan wrote:1690 is part of our history, but i am sure someone would not be allowed to express itBR wrote:Not remotely possible in Ireland or anywhere else.Russ wrote:I wish the Irish could keep politics out of sport
Very sad to see Ian Madigan cannot move on
Don't care what Madigan wears at the RDS. It's part (a selective part) of his nation's history. I'd like to think he would have a wee bit more decorum than to wear them in Ireland duty.
As you say, the way that the RoI, it's state and it's people choose to mark a significant date in the birth of that state is a matter for themselves (we know there will be 3 or 4 different versions even within the mainstream and no doubt there will be falling outs over the minor details).Kofi Annan wrote:1690 is part of our history, but i am sure someone would not be allowed to express itBR wrote:Not remotely possible in Ireland or anywhere else.Russ wrote:I wish the Irish could keep politics out of sport
Very sad to see Ian Madigan cannot move on
Don't care what Madigan wears at the RDS. It's part (a selective part) of his nation's history. I'd like to think he would have a wee bit more decorum than to wear them in Ireland duty.
But why wear them this weekend when the Anniversary is not until 27th March , unless you are wanting to make a statement, why go public with it unless your want to make a statement. what about a dignified act?
How much do you want to bet, that Munster, Connacht, and Leinster will have a minutes silence at their games with flags Lowered at half mast, anyone care to take up the bet ,
I am sure it will be well marked.
by the way I have no issue with it if they do, its just about mutual respect, which is not mutual nor Neutral in Ireland
I'm interested to know what the IRFU have planned for the 2 remaining 6 Nations gamesBR wrote:As you say, the way that the RoI, it's state and it's people choose to mark a significant date in the birth of that state is a matter for themselves (we know there will be 3 or 4 different versions even within the mainstream and no doubt there will be falling outs over the minor details).Kofi Annan wrote:1690 is part of our history, but i am sure someone would not be allowed to express itBR wrote:Not remotely possible in Ireland or anywhere else.Russ wrote:I wish the Irish could keep politics out of sport
Very sad to see Ian Madigan cannot move on
Don't care what Madigan wears at the RDS. It's part (a selective part) of his nation's history. I'd like to think he would have a wee bit more decorum than to wear them in Ireland duty.
But why wear them this weekend when the Anniversary is not until 27th March , unless you are wanting to make a statement, why go public with it unless your want to make a statement. what about a dignified act?
How much do you want to bet, that Munster, Connacht, and Leinster will have a minutes silence at their games with flags Lowered at half mast, anyone care to take up the bet ,
I am sure it will be well marked.
by the way I have no issue with it if they do, its just about mutual respect, which is not mutual nor Neutral in Ireland
None of my business. Just like it is none of my business if Zebre play in the Stadio xxv april (even if I was a fascist, I don't think I would have the right to be offended).
Personally I have more concerns about what a few other people consider an appropriate way to mark the 1916 centenary than a sportsman or the various political establishments of the subsequent state.
I imagine the word will be commemorate rather than glorify.Russ wrote:I'm interested to know what the IRFU have planned for the 2 remaining 6 Nations gamesBR wrote:As you say, the way that the RoI, it's state and it's people choose to mark a significant date in the birth of that state is a matter for themselves (we know there will be 3 or 4 different versions even within the mainstream and no doubt there will be falling outs over the minor details).Kofi Annan wrote:1690 is part of our history, but i am sure someone would not be allowed to express itBR wrote:Not remotely possible in Ireland or anywhere else.Russ wrote:I wish the Irish could keep politics out of sport
Very sad to see Ian Madigan cannot move on
Don't care what Madigan wears at the RDS. It's part (a selective part) of his nation's history. I'd like to think he would have a wee bit more decorum than to wear them in Ireland duty.
But why wear them this weekend when the Anniversary is not until 27th March , unless you are wanting to make a statement, why go public with it unless your want to make a statement. what about a dignified act?
How much do you want to bet, that Munster, Connacht, and Leinster will have a minutes silence at their games with flags Lowered at half mast, anyone care to take up the bet ,
I am sure it will be well marked.
by the way I have no issue with it if they do, its just about mutual respect, which is not mutual nor Neutral in Ireland
None of my business. Just like it is none of my business if Zebre play in the Stadio xxv april (even if I was a fascist, I don't think I would have the right to be offended).
Personally I have more concerns about what a few other people consider an appropriate way to mark the 1916 centenary than a sportsman or the various political establishments of the subsequent state.
I reckon we'll end up having to observe a minutes silence to glorify the death of many innocents
I commemorate no murderBR wrote:I imagine the word will be commemorate rather than glorify.Russ wrote:I'm interested to know what the IRFU have planned for the 2 remaining 6 Nations gamesBR wrote:As you say, the way that the RoI, it's state and it's people choose to mark a significant date in the birth of that state is a matter for themselves (we know there will be 3 or 4 different versions even within the mainstream and no doubt there will be falling outs over the minor details).Kofi Annan wrote:1690 is part of our history, but i am sure someone would not be allowed to express itBR wrote: Not remotely possible in Ireland or anywhere else.
Don't care what Madigan wears at the RDS. It's part (a selective part) of his nation's history. I'd like to think he would have a wee bit more decorum than to wear them in Ireland duty.
But why wear them this weekend when the Anniversary is not until 27th March , unless you are wanting to make a statement, why go public with it unless your want to make a statement. what about a dignified act?
How much do you want to bet, that Munster, Connacht, and Leinster will have a minutes silence at their games with flags Lowered at half mast, anyone care to take up the bet ,
I am sure it will be well marked.
by the way I have no issue with it if they do, its just about mutual respect, which is not mutual nor Neutral in Ireland
None of my business. Just like it is none of my business if Zebre play in the Stadio xxv april (even if I was a fascist, I don't think I would have the right to be offended).
Personally I have more concerns about what a few other people consider an appropriate way to mark the 1916 centenary than a sportsman or the various political establishments of the subsequent state.
I reckon we'll end up having to observe a minutes silence to glorify the death of many innocents
That's up to you, maybe you should get that stitched into your boots.Russ wrote: I commemorate no murder
I'm sure the "fans of quiff" would be in uproar and maybe take up armsBR wrote:That's up to you, maybe you should get that stitched into your boots.Russ wrote: I commemorate no murder
Totally agree.BaggyTrousers wrote:Madigan is a strange wee lad, with his Quiff or baldy head, his gurning like Gazza, his silly wee boots that he could just have worn but sure what's a statement unless you tell everybody about it.
Remarkable that the game finish 19-16 mind you, perhaps God is P O'Neill?
No fecks to give about 1916, 1690 or any other date in this godawful pieceofshite wee narrowminded country. Fu@k all those who do, including silly wee Madiquiff.
And Australiabazzaj wrote:Totally agree.BaggyTrousers wrote:Madigan is a strange wee lad, with his Quiff or baldy head, his gurning like Gazza, his silly wee boots that he could just have worn but sure what's a statement unless you tell everybody about it.
Remarkable that the game finish 19-16 mind you, perhaps God is P O'Neill?
No fecks to give about 1916, 1690 or any other date in this godawful pieceofshite wee narrowminded country. Fu@k all those who do, including silly wee Madiquiff.
Politics and sport are never great bed fellows.
He should stick to what he does best which is missing tackles in particular the one which cost us victory over the All Blacks.
It might have been better if he had tackled the bloke then he could have worn some boots to commemorate Irelands first victory over them.
But he can`t now because hes a complete twot who couldn`t do what hes actually paid to do.