Page 3 of 7

Re: Deysel.

Posted: Tue May 30, 2017 11:31 am
by Binman
Offering a 32 year old NIQ a 2 year deal: Is this consistent with IRFU policy or is this deal a SOP to placate us Nucifora loathing 'nordies'?

Re: Deysel.

Posted: Tue May 30, 2017 11:32 am
by kingofthehill
Cornerfleg wrote:You not rate him King ....?

He's not exactly the cleverest player ... but he's as hard as feck and with Coetzee there he should be kept in line. He will empty people! I worry that he will refuse to offload though.
32 yr old who didn't start for Munster.

If we had to sign him then why not a one year deal and look again next year?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Re: Deysel.

Posted: Tue May 30, 2017 11:33 am
by HairyJ
I double-hard fecker like him won't do us any harm

Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk

Re: Deysel.

Posted: Tue May 30, 2017 11:37 am
by Cornerfleg
I think he was on holiday at Munster and was a break glass option ... he might think differently up here (Fat Nick).
He put in some serious shifts with the Sharks ... ie he was preferred as a ball carrier over Marcel!

Pros - a hard nosed feck aff barsteward ... We really need one of those
Very fit, great engine and will empty people all day long. Doesn't believe in side steps or the like - route one snow plough.

Cons - had a bad rep in CC and S15 got a shed load of yellows and penalties ... Ryan Caldwell type level of smartness!!!
Watched him for years ... saw about 3 passes or offloads!

Re: Deysel.

Posted: Tue May 30, 2017 11:42 am
by Neil F
Given the circumstances, far from the worst signing I think Ulster could have made. But it also does seem to be a reflection of the circumstances. Doubt he'd have been anyone's first choice had this signing been made at the start of the season. Which kind of does beg the question about why it's a two-year deal...

Re: Deysel.

Posted: Tue May 30, 2017 12:06 pm
by Russ
kingofthehill wrote:Searching far and wide with loads of options. Image standard Ulster.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Limerick is further than Lisburn and Belfast is nicer than Limerick

Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk

Re: Deysel.

Posted: Tue May 30, 2017 12:08 pm
by Gary
Rather underwhelmed about Deysel. He does have something going for him though - he's got twice as many working knees than Coetzee and Botha have between them.

Re: Deysel.

Posted: Tue May 30, 2017 12:14 pm
by SparkyClarky
The games he did play for Munster he was solid and got over the gain line. As regards not being a starter as a loan player, we aren't privy to the detail of the loan as regards game time and playing IQ players first etc?

We saw what difference Marcel made in his four games allowing for a better balanced back row and guys getting to carry out their own roles rather than covering for obvious weakness at times.

I get his age profile etc but saying there could have been a better signing it's also far from the worst.

Giving him the benefit of the doubt.
:D :fleg: :red:

Re: Deysel.

Posted: Tue May 30, 2017 12:15 pm
by jean valjean
Happy enough with him. Beggars can't be choosers and he hopefully will be fit for a couple of seasons. Bit harsh to say he didn't start for Munster when they have POM and CJ in the back row.

Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk

Re: Deysel.

Posted: Tue May 30, 2017 12:16 pm
by MARB
A decent signing in the circumstances. He's the sort of player we've been crying out for. Not a saft saffer in the slightest and could take on the 'enforcer' role for us. Hopefully he hates quirky coffee outlets too. I'd like to hope we're still in the market for Dom Ryan. Would like the backrow options to be Coetzee, Dom Ryan, Chad, Deysel, Reidy, Rea, Diack with break glass options i.e. Timoney et al.

Re: Deysel.

Posted: Tue May 30, 2017 12:17 pm
by LegsLikeSausages
Neil F wrote:Given the circumstances, far from the worst signing I think Ulster could have made. But it also does seem to be a reflection of the circumstances. Doubt he'd have been anyone's first choice had this signing been made at the start of the season. Which kind of does beg the question about why it's a two-year deal...
Perhaps they believe it would be harder to sign a good new player in the season leading up to the World Cup than it might be attracting a player for after the tournament. If he was on a 1 year deal we may have had to have dipped even further into the bargain basement for cover in the 2018-19 season.

Re: Deysel.

Posted: Tue May 30, 2017 12:21 pm
by kingofthehill
jean valjean wrote:Happy enough with him. Beggars can't be choosers and he hopefully will be fit for a couple of seasons. Bit harsh to say he didn't start for Munster when they have POM and CJ in the back row.

Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk
I thought the whole point in an NIQ was to be world class.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Re: Deysel.

Posted: Tue May 30, 2017 12:26 pm
by jean valjean
kingofthehill wrote:
jean valjean wrote:Happy enough with him. Beggars can't be choosers and he hopefully will be fit for a couple of seasons. Bit harsh to say he didn't start for Munster when they have POM and CJ in the back row.

Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk
I thought the whole point in an NIQ was to be world class.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I agree but a few questions. Who else is available? Who was the last world class NIQ signed by a province apart from Charlie? The days of getting a ruan in their prime are over.

Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk

Re: Deysel.

Posted: Tue May 30, 2017 12:29 pm
by scrum5
Finally a player who adds a backbone to the pack and who will thump Hartley or any other cheap shot merchant the opposition have and while not world class he'll do for me

Re: Deysel.

Posted: Tue May 30, 2017 12:40 pm
by Neil F
LegsLikeSausages wrote:Perhaps they believe it would be harder to sign a good new player in the season leading up to the World Cup than it might be attracting a player for after the tournament. If he was on a 1 year deal we may have had to have dipped even further into the bargain basement for cover in the 2018-19 season.
Potentially but surely, in that eventuality, who Ulster could sign from the start of next season would become apparent quickly and Deysel signed on for another year? Or even a one-year contract with a one-year optional add-on if both sides agree?