The UAFC

WeeWorld wrote:

Dave wrote:Can Munster wash their own face?

Irish men's team is the money spinner. Munster and the other provinces are its supply and none of them are profit making afaik.

Some are doing better than others.

Dave wrote:

WeeWorld wrote:

Dave wrote:Can Munster wash their own face?

Irish men's team is the money spinner. Munster and the other provinces are its supply and none of them are profit making afaik.

Some are doing better than others.

Well I know who isn't

WeeWorld wrote:

Dave wrote:Can Munster wash their own face?

Irish men's team is the money spinner. Munster and the other provinces are its supply and none of them are profit making afaik.

Banbridge is

Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk

Hockey is all about the clubs. The provincial is inconsequential

Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk

Hockey schmockey, have the girls had their melts nacked in yit?

BR wrote:

Gerald the Mole wrote:my oh my how you have got it so wrong, first of all there is no such thing as womens hockey or womens rugby , its Women playing Rugby and Women playing hockey, as far as i am aware the laws of the games are the same for both genders.

The women's games have some rule about you needing to be a woman to play (whatever that means now days).

So it's not really 'Women playing rugby/hockey' in the way that it is 'Women riding horses'

BR , I know you like to deal in facts, can you refer one to the Rules were you got the information to make such a bold statement

Gerald the Mole wrote:

BR wrote:

Gerald the Mole wrote:my oh my how you have got it so wrong, first of all there is no such thing as womens hockey or womens rugby , its Women playing Rugby and Women playing hockey, as far as i am aware the laws of the games are the same for both genders.

The women's games have some rule about you needing to be a woman to play (whatever that means now days).

So it's not really 'Women playing rugby/hockey' in the way that it is 'Women riding horses'

BR , I know you like to deal in facts, can you refer one to the Rules were you got the information to make such a bold statement

I wouldn't know my way around hockey legislation to point you at even the most basic of rules.

However the IOC have some pretty complex rules about who can and cannot compete in women's events. All to do with levels of testosterone over a period of time.

There hasn't been a fact on here in about 5 years.

Dave wrote:There hasn't been a fact on here in about 5 years.

If Philip Michael Matthews, rugby player, formerly of this parish, not to mention Ulster, Ireland and B&I Lions, has an interest in the weemen's Hockey wot's goin' on just now, then for me, that makes it fair for comment on these forums.

and that's a fact.

Well done girls on another great performance. (if that doesn't sound too patronising )

Great great result for the weeemin. Onwards and upwards!

Are there highlights anywhere?

Does this mean we've got a wee semi?

BaggyTrousers wrote:Does this mean we've got a wee semi?

You might have ... I wouldn't know.

It pleased me a lot, but not that much.

BaggyTrousers wrote:Does this mean we've got a wee semi?

Against las senoritas de Espana no less Baggy!

Bet they're glad to be in Lahndahn. There's talk of 45C+ on the Iberian peninsula over the w/e!