The UAFC

Dave wrote:What like a misleading headline? The media wouldn't do that.

IIRC at the time of the the reports all players were interviewed on the same basis and were suspended by the club. As I understand it, the French having a inquisitorial legal system, everyone is literally 'helping the judge with his enquiries' until he says otherwise. The degree of involvement (or not) of a witness is not defined at the time they are interviewed.

http://www.the42.ie/paddy-jackson-perpi ... 9-Aug2018/



Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk

Always one kunt in the comments section.

Exactly

Dave wrote:Always one kunt in the comments section.

More than one in my estimation, a clear example of why all right-thinking Ulsterfolk should hate Mexican's guts. I despise Mexicans, even day old Mexicans or would-be Mexicans lurking in some Dub's beg looking for an egg to fertilise, for rest assured they will be brought to adulthood, by nature or nurture, as hateful smug self-satisfied Warren Gatland.

UlsterNo9 wrote:Open to correction but I believe Coulson is no longer a Connacht player.....

I thought Connaught had signed him for next year...

I never indicated that Farrell was involved but that he was arrested and interviewed which is more than Gilroy was and yet he faced a sanction for a private WhatsApp message.. then again if I was with someone who later went on to commit a criminal offence then that would have nothing to do with me.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/rugby-union/39576181

https://galwaybayfm.ie/connacht-sign-pr ... s-coulson/

So the IRFU sanction the signing of a player charged with rape and pending trial.. Yet.

Yes Coulson was released at the end of last season. It seems bizarre that the IRFU allowed him to be signed, given the circumstances.

Although they need explained I think the actions of the IRFU who must surely have approved this signing will never be explained... a case of northern prodies if ever there was one.

Looks like Gloucester may end up regretting letting Billy leave!!

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-g ... e-45201916

Eggs wrote:Looks like Gloucester may end up regretting letting Billy leave!!

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-g ... e-45201916

Surprise , surprise

Eggs wrote:Looks like Gloucester may end up regretting letting Billy leave!!

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-g ... e-45201916

I thought Cipriani would have fittedd in well here, that confirms it
On the other hand if he had been here he wouldn't have been in Jersey

Whether he is guilty or not Cipriani continually puts himself in these situations time and time again over the years so people lose sympathy.

Our lads were guilty of naiveity but if they were to allow strange unvetted women into their immediate intimate social company again you would have to question their sanity.

It wouldn’t surprise me if UR allowed Burns to have inserted a clause that he can leave to go back to Glous if and when he chooses...

The lad is unfortunate he has reputation which brings out the worst in others - few drinks in the wrong bar at the wrong time - a toxic mix - respond and you lose - walk you lose its no win .


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

rumncoke wrote:The lad is unfortunate he has reputation which brings out the worst in others - few drinks in the wrong bar at the wrong time - a toxic mix - respond and you lose - walk you lose its no win .


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Reputation doesn't seem to be much to do with it. If a bouncer tells you can't take your pint outside the bar, don't take your pint outside the bar. When the police say they are arresting you, be compliant. Unless you believe your reputation makes you more important than the ordinary pleb in the street. Then, by all means, be a twãt.


Oh, and few things pîss off door staff more than a 'Do you know who I am' attitude.