The UAFC

Cockatrice wrote:Wonder what the risk was to increase the security measures?

Why, who had event sec trying to check their bags. Some managed to bring their cans through as normal.

Sent from my Lenovo A7600-F using Tapatalk

Cockatrice wrote:Wonder what the risk was to increase the security measures?

I threatened bringing the .243 to sort the band out.

I believe the URSC have voiced their support for the band

Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk

Russ wrote:I believe the URSC have voiced their support for the band

Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk

Officially?

big mervyn wrote:

Russ wrote:I believe the URSC have voiced their support for the band

Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk

Officially?

I will tear up my membership.

If I ever get one.

Russ wrote:I believe the URSC have voiced their support for the band

What has brought you to that belief?

Is there any evidence that this belief is grounded in realily (sic)?

Cap'n Grumpy wrote:

Russ wrote:I believe the URSC have voiced their support for the band

What has brought you to that belief?

Is there any evidence that this belief is grounded in realily (sic)?

Perhaps Logan spread that rumour

Cap'n Grumpy wrote:

Russ wrote:I believe the URSC have voiced their support for the band

What has brought you to that belief?

Is there any evidence that this belief is grounded in realily (sic)?

The ongoing social media circle jerk in relation to the band

Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk

Most of those on URSC social media are not members of URSC.

Individuals may have an opinion, I believe that URSC as a club holds no official position re the band.

Russ wrote:

Cap'n Grumpy wrote:

Russ wrote:I believe the URSC have voiced their support for the band

What has brought you to that belief?

Is there any evidence that this belief is grounded in realily (sic)?

The ongoing social media circle jerk in relation to the band

Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk

By not condemning the band the URSC are supporting it. Much the same as those who did not condemn Hitler in 1930s Germany.

And yes, I am comparing the band with the Nazis.

The band you can just about cope with but this music over the speakers when there's a break in play has to stop ... it's so North Barnet

Dave wrote:

Russ wrote:

Cap'n Grumpy wrote:

Russ wrote:I believe the URSC have voiced their support for the band

What has brought you to that belief?

Is there any evidence that this belief is grounded in realily (sic)?

The ongoing social media circle jerk in relation to the band

Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk

By not condemning the band the URSC are supporting it. Much the same as those who did not condemn Hitler in 1930s Germany.

And yes, I am comparing the band with the Nazis.

That's very harsh Dave.

Far as I know, the Nazis had some pretty decent bands.

Mike Godwin

Sure you don't mean Ron Godwin Grumps?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MhBNfGVmuUg

ding dong2u wrote:The band you can just about cope with but this music over the speakers when there's a break in play has to stop ... it's so North Barnet

I'm with you, dd. That piped stuff really gets up my nose. Utterly, utterly unnecessary, distracting, cheap. Get rid of it and pay the band a retainer. That's how much I despise it.