The UAFC

Jackie Brown wrote:If we were relying on the official ulster website to keep us updated we'd be waiting a long long time for very little info.

Indeed. Like tomorrow night's selection. So far from ulsterrugby.com we have:

15. ?
14. ?
13. ?
12. ?
11. ?
10. ?
9. ?

1. ?
2. ?
3. ?
4. ?
5. ?
6. ?
7. Henry
8. ?

16. ?
17. ?
18. ?
19. ?
20. ?
21. ?
22. ?
23. ?

Could be a long night for Chad.

OneMore wrote:
Maybe publishing information before it goes on ulsterrugby.com is actually no big deal to anyone who matters?

Now Yin, I'm not going to call you a clown on your first working day of 2014, instead I'll mention the McGlock affair and allow you to reconsider that line.

Pip pip, you've been helped.

Never mind; they have announced the Munster team -
Munster: Felix Jones; Andrew Conway, Casey Laulala, Ivan Dineen, Ronan O'Mahony; Ian Keatley, Cathal Sheridan; Dave Kilcoyne, Damien Varley, Stephen Archer; Donncha O'Callaghan, Paul O'Connell; Peter O'Mahony Capt., Tommy O'Donnell, James Coughlan. Replacements: Duncan Casey, John Ryan, BJ Botha, Dave Foley, CJ Stander, Duncan Williams, Johnny Holland, Johne Murphy.

And Scarlets and Ospreys if anyones interested -

Ospreys: 15 Sam Davies, 14 Aisea Natoga, 13 Ben John, 12 Ashley Beck, 11 Jeff Hassler, 10 Dan Biggar, 9 Rhys Webb, 8 Joe Bearman, 7 Sam Lewis, 6 Justin Tipuric, 5 Ian Evans, 4 Alun Wyn Jones, 3 Aaron Jarvis, 2 Richard Hibbard, 1 Duncan Jones
Replacements: 16 Scott Baldwin, 17 Ryan Bevington, 18 Adam Jones, 19 James King, 20 Morgan Allen, 21 Tyler Ardron, 22 Tom Habberfield, 23 Richard Fussell



Scarlets: 15 Gareth Owen, 14 Kristian Phillips, 13 Nick Reynolds, 12 Scott Williams, 11 Frazier Climo, 10 Rhys Priestland, 9 Rhodri Williams, 8 Rob McCusker (c), 7 John Barclay, 6 Josh Turnbull, 5 George Earle, 4 Jake Ball, 3 Samson Lee, 2 Emyr Phillips, 1 Phil John
Replacements: 16 Kirby Myhill, 17 Rob Evans, 18 Jacobie Adriaanse, 19 Johan Snyman, 20 Aaron Shingler, 21 Gareth Davies, 22 Aled Thomas, 23 Jordan Williams.

Now there is another team playing tomorrow - no, don't know that one!

BaggyTrousers wrote:

OneMore wrote:
Maybe publishing information before it goes on ulsterrugby.com is actually no big deal to anyone who matters?

Now Yin, I'm not going to call you a clown on your first working day of 2014, instead I'll mention the McGlock affair and allow you to reconsider that line.

Pip pip, you've been helped.

Baggy, are you suggesting the culprits behind the McGlock mess were they who reported that he wasn't being kept? Or maybe was it more that it was dreadfully handled by those in charge?

Maybe it was leaked by a disgruntled hanger on who didnt like the new regime. interesting it was leaked when logan was on holiday!

nonplussed wrote:Maybe it was leaked by a disgruntled hanger on who didnt like the new regime. interesting it was leaked when logan was on holiday!

Of course non+'d but Yin doesn't worry about such things. Of coure these things are generally harmless however there are times when this is not the case as the McGlock affair adequately demonstrated.

Still not going to call yin a clown mind you, just innocent.

Behold ... Baggy the Merciful ...

Cornerfleg wrote:Behold ... Baggy the Merciful ...

Give me time.

BaggyTrousers wrote:

nonplussed wrote:Maybe it was leaked by a disgruntled hanger on who didnt like the new regime. interesting it was leaked when logan was on holiday!

Of course non+'d but Yin doesn't worry about such things. Of coure these things are generally harmless however there are times when this is not the case as the McGlock affair adequately demonstrated.

Still not going to call yin a clown mind you, just innocent.

Right, let's get this straight. In the scenario where someone leaks information to the press, and the press publish it, we're saying that the press were the guilty party here, not the one who leaked the information?

Seems to me a bizarre way of seeing things. But hey ho, we're all different I suppose.

i'm blaming the leaker 100%, the press however joined in the charade with that woeful press conferecne

It could be worse - we could be Welsh!

the man speaketh the truth!

Cornerfleg wrote:It could be worse - we could be Welsh!

If he was welsh, we'd have no option but to burn him..........

OneMore wrote:Right, let's get this straight. In the scenario where someone leaks information to the press, and the press publish it, we're saying that the press were the guilty party here, not the one who leaked the information?

Seems to me a bizarre way of seeing things. But hey ho, we're all different I suppose.

What about a scenario where ALL the press are given a story with an agreement that they can ALL use it on or after a certain date, but one journo jumps the gun?

Is the journo at fault, or the regime that trusted them all?