The UAFC

Cockatrice wrote:

Alister Scott wrote:

Wee Woman wrote:Who actually cited the players

Cockatrice


I claim my prize.

Col..... hopefully you will come collect said prize I have it waiting for you.

I'm so ex - cited

Hopefully by end of week, Roger and Luke will be too!

Snipe Watson wrote:

Blackskulllad wrote:

Rooster wrote:

Blackskulllad wrote:Honestly we have been hard done by at time but Marshall deserves a ban for stupidity if nothing else. What time did the Wilson incident occur

You deserve a ban for not looking back a couple of posts for the video link

I read the full thread you ask the same question and your link plays the video from the start for me.

I asked a simple question you asked it too so did wee woman no one else was met with hostility

Roger 1:28
Luke 1:16
Hardly hostility. Neither Rooster nor Alister Scott are usually given to hostility.

Snipe, I know you are considerably more expert on the bible than I am, but how did I miss the book of Roger? What does he say in 1:28? "Thou shalt not doubt Baggy" I hope.

Damn, I see gr .............Al Scott has made a similar josh.

BaggyTrousers wrote:

Snipe Watson wrote:

Blackskulllad wrote:

Rooster wrote:

Blackskulllad wrote:Honestly we have been hard done by at time but Marshall deserves a ban for stupidity if nothing else. What time did the Wilson incident occur

You deserve a ban for not looking back a couple of posts for the video link

I read the full thread you ask the same question and your link plays the video from the start for me.

I asked a simple question you asked it too so did wee woman no one else was met with hostility

Roger 1:28
Luke 1:16
Hardly hostility. Neither Rooster nor Alister Scott are usually given to hostility.

Snipe, I know you are considerably more expert on the bible than I am, but how did I miss the book of Roger? What does he say in 1:28? "Thou shalt not doubt Baggy" I hope.

Damn, I see gr .............Al Scott has made a similar josh.

Doubt Baggy? Sure it's all just a matter of faith

"Because you have seen me, you have believed; blessed are those who have not seen and yet have believed."

The Book of Roger is a geographical text written in Arabic in the 12th century.

On Britain:

As for Britain, it "is set in the Sea of Darkness. It is a considerable island, whose shape is that of the head of an ostrich, and where there are flourishing towns, high mountains, great rivers and plains. This country is most fertile; its inhabitants are brave, active and enterprising, but all is in the grip of perpetual winter."

Dave wrote:If Marshall is banned we could do a lot worse then recall Arnold from the u20s. Big unit.

The same Arnold that limped off injured on Friday night against England?

big mervyn wrote:The Book of Roger is a geographical text written in Arabic in the 12th century.

Translated into English it goes under the title "Fifty Shades of Grey"

LegsLikeSausages wrote:

Dave wrote:If Marshall is banned we could do a lot worse then recall Arnold from the u20s. Big unit.

The same Arnold that limped off injured on Friday night against England?

Feck.

Dave wrote:

LegsLikeSausages wrote:

Dave wrote:If Marshall is banned we could do a lot worse then recall Arnold from the u20s. Big unit.

The same Arnold that limped off injured on Friday night against England?

Feck.

Indeed. Someone else mentioned that Stanley has played a lot at 12. There is also the Cave-Ludik option with Nelson at 15.

LegsLikeSausages wrote:

Dave wrote:

LegsLikeSausages wrote:

Dave wrote:If Marshall is banned we could do a lot worse then recall Arnold from the u20s. Big unit.

The same Arnold that limped off injured on Friday night against England?

Feck.

Indeed. Someone else mentioned that Stanley has played a lot at 12. There is also the Cave-Ludik option with Nelson at 15.

Yeah we do have some options alright.

Dave wrote:

LegsLikeSausages wrote:

Dave wrote:

LegsLikeSausages wrote:

Dave wrote:If Marshall is banned we could do a lot worse then recall Arnold from the u20s. Big unit.

The same Arnold that limped off injured on Friday night against England?

Feck.

Indeed. Someone else mentioned that Stanley has played a lot at 12. There is also the Cave-Ludik option with Nelson at 15.

Yeah we do have some options alright.

We do, but every one of them weakens the team a little bit more. We really could do without losing Luke or Roger.

I have a horrible feeling we're going to lose both of them for this match.

Snipe Watson wrote:

Dave wrote:

LegsLikeSausages wrote:

Dave wrote:

LegsLikeSausages wrote: The same Arnold that limped off injured on Friday night against England?

Feck.

Indeed. Someone else mentioned that Stanley has played a lot at 12. There is also the Cave-Ludik option with Nelson at 15.

Yeah we do have some options alright.

We do, but every one of them weakens the team a little bit more. We really could do without losing Luke or Roger.

Very true. Probably particularly Wilson given the leadership he brings as well is his current form. Diack would slot in and maybe we might have Henderson for 60 mins too v the dragons.

We could absorb Luke's loss better but I think he really needs this time without McCloskey and Olding to continue to find his form again, which he certainly looked to be on the path to this last match.

Blackskulllad wrote:

Rooster wrote:

Blackskulllad wrote:Honestly we have been hard done by at time but Marshall deserves a ban for stupidity if nothing else. What time did the Wilson incident occur

You deserve a ban for not looking back a couple of posts for the video link

I read the full thread you ask the same question and your link plays the video from the start for me.

I asked a simple question you asked it too so did wee woman no one else was met with hostility

Keep your hair on, I don't understand why the links don't start in the correct place for you as they are designed to work that way, the times you quote are the match times which in the first case are rather confusing as the replay is then actually a bit later and the clock then goes back to it

Sarcasm is my middle name by the way

Ref the Marshall incident -if the charge is 'reckless endangerment' shouldn't the other Scarlets player also be cited? He kicked him harder than Luke.... then again, if your own team mates could be done for 'reckless endangerment' half our squad would be cited every week....