The UAFC

Logan only went to Dublin to collect the 6 Nations Cup and Triple Crown because one of his kpi’s was to bring trophies to Ulster.

Bit of a toss up as to where to post this but stuck it
here under Logan / what passes his lips - which seems
to come closest .........

Another tissue of lies ................
Rugby writers deny supporting Ulster in barring news journalists
https://www.irishtimes.com/sport/rugby/ ... -1.3467626

Mac wrote:Bit of a toss up as to where to post this but stuck it
here under Logan / what passes his lips - which seems
to come closest .........

Another tissue of lies ................
Rugby writers deny supporting Ulster in barring news journalists
https://www.irishtimes.com/sport/rugby/ ... -1.3467626

They restricted it to only sports journalists

I see no issue with this
As usual the media have spun it for clicks

Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk

Russ wrote:

Mac wrote:Bit of a toss up as to where to post this but stuck it
here under Logan / what passes his lips - which seems
to come closest .........

Another tissue of lies ................
Rugby writers deny supporting Ulster in barring news journalists
https://www.irishtimes.com/sport/rugby/ ... -1.3467626

They restricted it to only sports journalists

I see no issue with this
As usual the media have spun it for clicks

Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk

I agree, the media have been parasites in all of this.

Sent from my Pixel 2 using Tapatalk

Russ wrote:

Mac wrote:Bit of a toss up as to where to post this but stuck it
here under Logan / what passes his lips - which seems
to come closest .........

Another tissue of lies ................
Rugby writers deny supporting Ulster in barring news journalists
https://www.irishtimes.com/sport/rugby/ ... -1.3467626

They restricted it to only sports journalists

I see no issue with this
As usual the media have spun it for clicks

Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk

They were quite right to keep the bandwagon jumpers out. They would have wanted to turn it into a circus. BBCNI and the Belly laugh are capable of doing that without external aid.

It’s yet another PR blunder from UR which has come back to bite them. Already articles are appearing calling into question the decision to sack /revoke PJ & SO. Also now pointing out the double standards and the terminal decline of Ulster under Slogan.

Tender wrote:It’s yet another PR blunder from UR which has come back to bite them. Already articles are appearing calling into question the decision to sack /revoke PJ & SO. Also now pointing out the double standards and the terminal decline of Ulster under Slogan.

The only way the media can squeeze more mileage out of this story is to do a 180 and take the contrary view.
They couldn't be accused of idealism.

Russ wrote:

Mac wrote:Bit of a toss up as to where to post this but stuck it
here under Logan / what passes his lips - which seems
to come closest .........

Another tissue of lies ................
Rugby writers deny supporting Ulster in barring news journalists
https://www.irishtimes.com/sport/rugby/ ... -1.3467626

They restricted it to only sports journalists

I see no issue with this
As usual the media have spun it for clicks

Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk

Russ read it again, UR suggested that the decision was in line with what the sports journos wanted, they are saying they were never consulted, so a dishonest decision by UR, I hear you and CT are London’s topshaggers, meeting at the Admiral Duncan ?

Kofi Annan wrote:

Russ wrote:

Mac wrote:Bit of a toss up as to where to post this but stuck it
here under Logan / what passes his lips - which seems
to come closest .........

Another tissue of lies ................
Rugby writers deny supporting Ulster in barring news journalists
https://www.irishtimes.com/sport/rugby/ ... -1.3467626

They restricted it to only sports journalists

I see no issue with this
As usual the media have spun it for clicks

Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk

Russ read it again, UR suggested that the decision was in line with what the sports journos wanted, they are saying they were never consulted, so a dishonest decision by UR, I hear you and CT are London’s topshaggers, meeting at the Admiral Duncan ?

Correct Kofi. If the rugby journos did not request this or were not consulted then this looks like a blatant lie by UR. Hard to believe a lie could emanate from UR, i know....

Snipe Watson wrote:

Tender wrote:It’s yet another PR blunder from UR which has come back to bite them. Already articles are appearing calling into question the decision to sack /revoke PJ & SO. Also now pointing out the double standards and the terminal decline of Ulster under Slogan.

The only way the media can squeeze more mileage out of this story is to do a 180 and take the contrary view.
They couldn't be accused of idealism.

Correct. For the first time since the trial I googled one of the players names and there was not a single article posted that day. Then this one appears.

It may have sunk in that two players lives have been ruined and that the press need to STFU because they need to work.

The lads have gone and they ain't coming back. At this stage I couldn't really give a flying feck what the papers say any more, they can't do any more damage than they've already done.

Maybe even they might turn their attention on the spoofer and some good could come of it. Wouldn't that be a delicious irony.

Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk

Bart S wrote:

Kofi Annan wrote:

Russ wrote:

Mac wrote:Bit of a toss up as to where to post this but stuck it
here under Logan / what passes his lips - which seems
to come closest .........

Another tissue of lies ................
Rugby writers deny supporting Ulster in barring news journalists
https://www.irishtimes.com/sport/rugby/ ... -1.3467626

They restricted it to only sports journalists

I see no issue with this
As usual the media have spun it for clicks

Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk

Russ read it again, UR suggested that the decision was in line with what the sports journos wanted, they are saying they were never consulted, so a dishonest decision by UR, I hear you and CT are London’s topshaggers, meeting at the Admiral Duncan ?

Correct Kofi. If the rugby journos did not request this or were not consulted then this looks like a blatant lie by UR. Hard to believe a lie could emanate from UR, i know....

Did they not say something like, "...after consulting regular attendees ..." ?

I'm guessing there are regular attendees who are not journalists. Maybe they asked Ethel and Beaker.

BR wrote:

Bart S wrote:

Kofi Annan wrote:

Russ wrote:

Mac wrote:Bit of a toss up as to where to post this but stuck it
here under Logan / what passes his lips - which seems
to come closest .........

Another tissue of lies ................
Rugby writers deny supporting Ulster in barring news journalists
https://www.irishtimes.com/sport/rugby/ ... -1.3467626

They restricted it to only sports journalists

I see no issue with this
As usual the media have spun it for clicks

Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk

Russ read it again, UR suggested that the decision was in line with what the sports journos wanted, they are saying they were never consulted, so a dishonest decision by UR, I hear you and CT are London’s topshaggers, meeting at the Admiral Duncan ?

Correct Kofi. If the rugby journos did not request this or were not consulted then this looks like a blatant lie by UR. Hard to believe a lie could emanate from UR, i know....

Did they not say something like, "...after consulting regular attendees ..." ?

I'm guessing there are regular attendees who are not journalists. Maybe they asked Ethel and Beaker.

No, they were referring to the 11 regular media chaps

Kofi Annan wrote:

Russ wrote:

Mac wrote:Bit of a toss up as to where to post this but stuck it
here under Logan / what passes his lips - which seems
to come closest .........

Another tissue of lies ................
Rugby writers deny supporting Ulster in barring news journalists
https://www.irishtimes.com/sport/rugby/ ... -1.3467626

They restricted it to only sports journalists

I see no issue with this
As usual the media have spun it for clicks

Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk

Russ read it again, UR suggested that the decision was in line with what the sports journos wanted, they are saying they were never consulted, so a dishonest decision by UR, I hear you and CT are London’s topshaggers, meeting at the Admiral Duncan ?

Classic UR

Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk

Just wanted to bring this back up the topic list on the forum so that anyone who logs on can see that Logan Out is still in the forefront of the minds of many supoorters.

Now that he has drunk off the journos through the UR banning malarkey hopefully they will take umbrage with UR management too.

LOGAN OUT