Page 4 of 52

Re: PADDY JACKSON

Posted: Fri May 10, 2019 9:24 am
by Dave
UlsterNo9 wrote:
Dave wrote:If no feminist group protested against Danny Cipriani, then there are certainly no grounds to protest Paddy.
That would be Danny Cipriani recently announced premiership players player of the year.
Yep

Re: PADDY JACKSON

Posted: Fri May 10, 2019 9:32 am
by Rooster
Frank wrote:The real shame is that UR and Ireland realeased PJ and SO under pressure from the femnazis.
This did two things.
1. Confirmed some form of guilt in their eyes.
2. Made them realise that their sordid tactics work adding fuel to the fire.
Ironically it's the English through Stokes and Cipriani that show how to deal with these matters.

I would urge London Irish to behave like a proper club and realise that these people are acting like tempestuous children who don't get their own way and treat them accordingly.
Threats of not drinking Guinness or attending matches are completely hollow.
In response I'm officially boycotting Tampax.
Boycotting Tampax is a bit on the serious side Frank, what do you do now if you get a dig in the nose and need to plug the bleeding ?

Re: PADDY JACKSON

Posted: Fri May 10, 2019 10:06 am
by UlsterNo9
Dave wrote:
UlsterNo9 wrote:
Dave wrote:If no feminist group protested against Danny Cipriani, then there are certainly no grounds to protest Paddy.
That would be Danny Cipriani recently announced premiership players player of the year.
Yep
A good shot in the arm being backed by your colleagues and peers.

Re: PADDY JACKSON

Posted: Fri May 10, 2019 10:20 am
by Frank
Rooster wrote:
Frank wrote:The real shame is that UR and Ireland realeased PJ and SO under pressure from the femnazis.
This did two things.
1. Confirmed some form of guilt in their eyes.
2. Made them realise that their sordid tactics work adding fuel to the fire.
Ironically it's the English through Stokes and Cipriani that show how to deal with these matters.

I would urge London Irish to behave like a proper club and realise that these people are acting like tempestuous children who don't get their own way and treat them accordingly.
Threats of not drinking Guinness or attending matches are completely hollow.
In response I'm officially boycotting Tampax.
Boycotting Tampax is a bit on the serious side Frank, what do you do now if you get a dig in the nose and need to plug the bleeding ?
Good point didn't think this out.
Might alternatively start chastising the cast and creators of the vagina monologues until the lads are reinstated.

Re: PADDY JACKSON

Posted: Fri May 10, 2019 10:51 am
by Cap'n Grumpy
Frank wrote:
Russ wrote:
Frank wrote:The real shame is that UR and Ireland realeased PJ and SO under pressure from the femnazis.
This did two things.
1. Confirmed some form of guilt in their eyes.
2. Made them realise that their sordid tactics work adding fuel to the fire.
Ironically it's the English through Stokes and Cipriani that show how to deal with these matters.

I would urge London Irish to behave like a proper club and realise that these people are acting like tempestuous children who don't get their own way and treat them accordingly.
Threats of not drinking Guinness or attending matches are completely hollow.
In response I'm officially boycotting Tampax.
I've boycotted Leinster

Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
That's what I meant
Stuck up tw#ts
Tampax or Leinster?

or both? >EW

Re: PADDY JACKSON

Posted: Fri May 10, 2019 12:00 pm
by Shan
To be fair some of the "outraged" folk are so energised it is quite entertaining to watch. The comment from one stating she would never watch rugby again is just brilliantly funny. So many silly people out there who really haven't enough to be troubling them.

Re: PADDY JACKSON

Posted: Fri May 10, 2019 12:23 pm
by Cap'n Grumpy
Shan wrote:To be fair some of the "outraged" folk are so energised it is quite entertaining to watch. The comment from one stating she would never watch rugby again is just brilliantly funny. So many silly people out there who really haven't enough to be troubling them.
If they are from up here, probably the sort that would walk miles just to be offended by an orange or green parade.

Or perhaps this the middle class equivalent (or so they like to think). :roll:

Re: PADDY JACKSON

Posted: Fri May 10, 2019 10:48 pm
by twiglet
I don't know how folk know where the feminazis are from but a few of the posters reckon a number of them are from the south. If so, why are they so bothered about Paddy and where he plays?
A few years ago Ismaheel Akinade was one of three who raped a 14 year old girl a number of times. He was eventually found GUILTY but continued to play football for Waterford in the league of Ireland. The feminine network were nowhere to be seen. Why? Would it be because of his colour, or maybe his religion or maybe because Ismaheel was not a rugby player?

Re: PADDY JACKSON

Posted: Fri May 10, 2019 11:17 pm
by Frank
Or there wasn't a sectarian narrative

Re: PADDY JACKSON

Posted: Sat May 11, 2019 1:51 am
by justinr73
UlsterNo9 wrote:
Dave wrote:If no feminist group protested against Danny Cipriani, then there are certainly no grounds to protest Paddy.
That would be Danny Cipriani recently announced premiership players player of the year.
Was it the back end of the bus he assaulted or the front end?

Re: PADDY JACKSON

Posted: Sat May 11, 2019 5:03 am
by rumncoke
See some clueless unoriginal ,maid on a mission ,writing for the Guardian regurgitates the story .

Taking most offence at the use of the word slut - because she considers it is a word that infers - the idea of middle class entitlement .

For a journalist she should first look up the dictionary meaning of the word and secondly when commenting on the use of the word that person who used the word “slut “ as a defining a social class was the Accuser not the defendants and definitely not Paddy Jackson - which in my opinion is what the article infers .

The journalist goes by the name Lara Whyte a Belfast journalist
( is she I wonder the daughter of a bandage maker )





Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Re: PADDY JACKSON

Posted: Sat May 11, 2019 6:04 am
by Frank
Just read the "offending" article by someone professing to be a journalist.
Words fail me.
Specifically hers.

Re: PADDY JACKSON

Posted: Sat May 11, 2019 10:08 am
by Rooster
One of the so called London Irish supporters is a gem, check out her profileImage


[https://pbs]

Tina Winter

@cobher

·

15h

Replying to

@LaraWhyte

and

@londonirish

I emailed London Irish when this appt was was first rumoured expressing very much your views. No answer came the loud reply. I’m in my 80th year and have attended LR games for years - no more. What message does it give to the girls and young women who are part of London Irish?

https://mobile.twitter.com/cobher

Re: PADDY JACKSON

Posted: Sat May 11, 2019 12:49 pm
by Jackie Brown
I checked it out when I saw she had supported them for 80yrs. Very strange

Sent from my Pixel 2 using Tapatalk

Re: PADDY JACKSON

Posted: Sat May 11, 2019 1:08 pm
by UlsterNo9
Jackie Brown wrote:I checked it out when I saw she had supported them for 80yrs. Very strange

Sent from my Pixel 2 using Tapatalk
Hope my missus looks like that at 80 :thumleft:

Feck it, I'm a generous so and so, I hope everyones missus looks like that at 80!