Re: L.I.
Posted: Sat Jul 27, 2019 10:40 am
There is a second case outstanding and until it is decided the the damages from the first case remain undefined in such circumstances the lack of press and media coverage is not unsurprising.
I expect if the damages awarded are, substantial and examplary, then the media coverage hopefully will be greater.
It has to be remembered that social media was nearly responsible for the case being abandoned --on a number of occasions and that the defence had to change the character witnesses because of the nature of the social media.
( Which would have been a miscarriage of justice and really left the defendants exposed to worst effects of social media )
The extent to which the cross examination of the complainant was affected by the possible response on social media is also an unknown factor -- because the truth is so many the lies and inconsistencies contained in her evidence went unchallenged by the police and defence Barristers .
To some extent I can understand the police neglect since they never expected the case to go to court due to evidence of the only independent witness and once it had been decided to go to court , the challenging of her evidence by the police would be pointless -- which of course was why the handling of the case by the police was highlighted by the defence.
So I hope the Judge really does make the Damages exemplary -- to some extent it doesn't matter if the bitches can afford them and whether they are paid in full .
Sue me Paddy then could be a possibility for the person who instigated the hash tag twitter account.??? -- because it encouraged harassment and victimisation and the loss of employment.
I expect if the damages awarded are, substantial and examplary, then the media coverage hopefully will be greater.
It has to be remembered that social media was nearly responsible for the case being abandoned --on a number of occasions and that the defence had to change the character witnesses because of the nature of the social media.
( Which would have been a miscarriage of justice and really left the defendants exposed to worst effects of social media )
The extent to which the cross examination of the complainant was affected by the possible response on social media is also an unknown factor -- because the truth is so many the lies and inconsistencies contained in her evidence went unchallenged by the police and defence Barristers .
To some extent I can understand the police neglect since they never expected the case to go to court due to evidence of the only independent witness and once it had been decided to go to court , the challenging of her evidence by the police would be pointless -- which of course was why the handling of the case by the police was highlighted by the defence.
So I hope the Judge really does make the Damages exemplary -- to some extent it doesn't matter if the bitches can afford them and whether they are paid in full .
Sue me Paddy then could be a possibility for the person who instigated the hash tag twitter account.??? -- because it encouraged harassment and victimisation and the loss of employment.
