Big Nick Injury !

armalig · Post by **armalig** » Fri Oct 05, 2012 9:11 pm

Hope big Nick Ok for next week -Ulster becomg kind of used to him now as wrecking ball - with few backups left . Anyone know any updates? Hes the new Ulster talisman ...people really want to see him on the park. QUICK RECOVERY PLEASE NIC !!

againstthehead · Post by **againstthehead** » Fri Oct 05, 2012 9:50 pm

Backrow isn't our weakest place in terms of depth, however, with Wilson a couple of weeks away and Diack still out, we could deffo do with Nick.

ruckover · Post by **ruckover** » Fri Oct 05, 2012 9:56 pm

At the moment we have no other 8 cover. Diack and Wilson are injured, and nobody else is a specialist there. Only option I could think of is move Henry to 8 and bring in someone at 7.

darkside lightside · Post by **darkside lightside** » Fri Oct 05, 2012 10:03 pm

Looked like a smack to the ribs that the big lad will laugh off in the week to come..

Dave · Post by **Dave** » Fri Oct 05, 2012 10:03 pm

Henderson can play 8! Is he registered for the Heiny? He would be my pick. Hopefully Nick will be ok he got us moving a few times tonight.

againstthehead · Post by **againstthehead** » Fri Oct 05, 2012 10:07 pm

ruckover wrote:At the moment we have no other 8 cover. Diack and Wilson are injured, and nobody else is a specialist there. Only option I could think of is move Henry to 8 and bring in someone at 7.

bang on that man. henry to 8, mcormish to 7 with either hendo or doyle on the bench. Decent backrow but average in terms of the HEC.

kingofthehill · Post by **kingofthehill** » Fri Oct 05, 2012 10:08 pm

Diack apparently is a lot worse than first thought.

pythagoras · Post by **pythagoras** » Fri Oct 05, 2012 10:15 pm

Hook doesn't rate Nick (I wouldn't worry about that) but Quinlan reckons he needs to be playing every week or he'd be inclined to pile on the pounds (at least I think that's what he said).

againstthehead · Post by **againstthehead** » Fri Oct 05, 2012 10:18 pm

pythagoras wrote:Hook doesn't rate Nick (I wouldn't worry about that) but Quinlan reckons he needs to be playing every week or he'd be inclined to pile on the pounds (at least I think that's what he said).

oh flip, don't start another NW is good or bad thread!!!!!!! stay on topic!

Wee Woman · Post by **Wee Woman** » Fri Oct 05, 2012 10:31 pm

kingofthehill wrote:Diack apparently is a lot worse than first thought.

Not good - is this related to that haematoma?

kingofthehill · Post by **kingofthehill** » Fri Oct 05, 2012 10:38 pm

Wee Woman wrote:
kingofthehill wrote:Diack apparently is a lot worse than first thought.
Not good - is this related to that haematoma?

No idea tbh.

Snipe Watson · Post by **Snipe Watson** » Fri Oct 05, 2012 11:43 pm

The word is that it's a popped rib.

ruckover · Post by **ruckover** » Fri Oct 05, 2012 11:45 pm

Snipe Watson wrote:The word is that it's a popped rib.

What's the recovery time?

CIMANFOREVER · Post by **CIMANFOREVER** » Fri Oct 05, 2012 11:46 pm

Snipe Watson wrote:The word is that it's a popped rib.

2 or three weeks minimum then...

againstthehead · Post by **againstthehead** » Fri Oct 05, 2012 11:46 pm

darn. Better than 2-3 months through...

The UAFC

Big Nick Injury !

Big Nick Injury !

Re: Big Nick Injury !

Re: Big Nick Injury !

Re: Big Nick Injury !

Re: Big Nick Injury !

Re: Big Nick Injury !

Re: Big Nick Injury !

Re: Big Nick Injury !

Re: Big Nick Injury !

Re: Big Nick Injury !

Re: Big Nick Injury !

Re: Big Nick Injury !

Re: Big Nick Injury !

Re: Big Nick Injury !

Re: Big Nick Injury !