Ulster v Clermont
Moderator: Moderators
Ulster v Clermont
Well, here we go guys. This is the game that defines our European season - will it be Heineken or Amlin? Clermont are a very good side, which is extremely obvious, but we all know we have the strength and form to beat them, top the pool and head to a home QF. Honestly, it is looking like a cracking game. Barring any more injuries my team would be:
15. Terblanche
14. Trimble
13. Whitten
12. Wallace
11. Gilroy
10. Pienaar
9. Marshall
1. Court
2. Best
3. Afoa
4. Muller
5. Tuohy
6. Ferris
7. Henry
8. Wannenburg
I don't want to start the whole half back debate again, but I do think we're more of a threat with Marshall-Pienaar.
15. Terblanche
14. Trimble
13. Whitten
12. Wallace
11. Gilroy
10. Pienaar
9. Marshall
1. Court
2. Best
3. Afoa
4. Muller
5. Tuohy
6. Ferris
7. Henry
8. Wannenburg
I don't want to start the whole half back debate again, but I do think we're more of a threat with Marshall-Pienaar.
You haven't seen me at my best yet. Let's be honest, you probably never will.
- Cap'n Grumpy
- Rí na Cúige Uladh
- Posts: 15702
- Joined: Thu Aug 14, 2008 4:21 pm
- Location: second barrier up, at the half-way line ... or is the third?
Re: Ulster v Clermont
Why start it then?ruckover wrote:Well, here we go guys. This is the game that defines our European season - will it be Heineken or Amlin? Clermont are a very good side, which is extremely obvious, but we all know we have the strength and form to beat them, top the pool and head to a home QF. Honestly, it is looking like a cracking game. Barring any more injuries my team would be:
15. Terblanche
14. Trimble
13. Whitten
12. Wallace
11. Gilroy
10. Pienaar
9. Marshall
1. Court
2. Best
3. Afoa
4. Muller
5. Tuohy
6. Ferris
7. Henry
8. Wannenburg
I don't want to start the whole half back debate again, but I do think we're more of a threat with Marshall-Pienaar.
I'm not arguing -
I'm just explaining why I'm right
I'm just explaining why I'm right
- againstthehead
- Lord Chancellor
- Posts: 6933
- Joined: Thu Feb 07, 2008 8:58 am
- Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Re: Ulster v Clermont
I assume Cave is out?
Climb up onto the top of your house and start screaming: 'stand up for the Ulstermen, stand.......'
Re: Ulster v Clermont
Nothing is confirmed.againstthehead wrote:I assume Cave is out?
Re: Ulster v Clermont
Harsh on Whitten, but I think I'd rather have Terblanche at 13 and D'Arcy at 15 than Whitten at 13 if Cave can't make it.
Re: Ulster v Clermont
ruckover wrote:Well, here we go guys. This is the game that defines our European season - will it be Heineken or Amlin? Clermont are a very good side, which is extremely obvious, but we all know we have the strength and form to beat them, top the pool and head to a home QF. Honestly, it is looking like a cracking game. Barring any more injuries my team would be:
15. Terblanche
14. Trimble
13. Whitten
12. Wallace
11. Gilroy
10. Pienaar
9. Marshall
1. Court
2. Best
3. Afoa
4. Muller
5. Tuohy
6. Ferris
7. Henry
8. Wannenburg
I don't want to start the whole half back debate again, but I do think we're more of a threat with Marshall-Pienaar.
Would be amazed if McGlock picked anything but the same starting XV if they are all fit and any changes will be injury enforced. Cave will be given as long as possible to recover.
-
- Steward
- Posts: 989
- Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2010 6:54 pm
- Location: Neither here nor there
Re: Ulster v Clermont
I'd put Whitten at 12 and PW at 13 assuming that is that Cave isn't going to make it
Re: Ulster v Clermont
I think the fact that Whitten came on for Cave on Friday night is a big indication that he will start if Cave is not fit. Besides, McGlock is clearly not a big fan of Darcy, it would only need 1 change rather than 2 and Terblanche hasn't played 13 for Ulster yet as far as I'm aware (although I stand to be corrected!).Nightsoil wrote:Harsh on Whitten, but I think I'd rather have Terblanche at 13 and D'Arcy at 15 than Whitten at 13 if Cave can't make it.
Re: Ulster v Clermont
We all have just witnessed one of the most outstanding team performance from Ulster in recent memory and we have one person doubtful for Saturday.
So the automatic reaction by many is to shuffle around as many positions as possible
IMO is start with the winning proven combination and if pushed bring Marshall on 10 mins earlier.
So the automatic reaction by many is to shuffle around as many positions as possible
IMO is start with the winning proven combination and if pushed bring Marshall on 10 mins earlier.
I’m feeling Perky this morning.
-
- Initiate
- Posts: 337
- Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2010 8:15 pm
Re: Ulster v Clermont
TinPig wrote:We all have just witnessed one of the most outstanding team performance from Ulster in recent memory and we have one person doubtful for Saturday.
So the automatic reaction by many is to shuffle around as many positions as possible
IMO is start with the winning proven combination and if pushed bring Marshall on 10 mins earlier.
+1
I agree if it's not broke don't fix it, Marshall is doing a great job coming off the he seems to read the game well and then he has the extra vavavoooom which no defence can stop come 70mins on their feet.
Re: Ulster v Clermont
Assuming Cave (and everyone else) is fit then I would put out the same 15 again.
Whitten for Cave seems the natural choice if not.
Marshall is a good impact sub at the moment.
Whitten for Cave seems the natural choice if not.
Marshall is a good impact sub at the moment.
- againstthehead
- Lord Chancellor
- Posts: 6933
- Joined: Thu Feb 07, 2008 8:58 am
- Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Re: Ulster v Clermont
If Spence is 100% then maybe spence at 13 but otherwise a PW/Whitten partnership on the cards. Whitten's great physical presence could even be a bonus...
Climb up onto the top of your house and start screaming: 'stand up for the Ulstermen, stand.......'
Re: Ulster v Clermont
Agreed .the positions could even be swapped depending on set piece attack/ defence scenario where whitten could cover the 10/12 channel more effectively against the big French centres .againstthehead wrote:If Spence is 100% then maybe spence at 13 but otherwise a PW/Whitten partnership on the cards. Whitten's great physical presence could even be a bonus...
We dont need the English to win the European Cup
Re: Ulster v Clermont
Who is this Rougerie chap you are talking aboutLastKnightoftheproms wrote:Lastly, would you not want the bigger man squaring up to Rougerie?
“That made me feel very special and underlined to me that Ulster is more than a team, it is a community and a rugby family"
Rory Best
Rory Best
Re: Ulster v Clermont
Anyone remember when Whitten came on for Cave on Friday night whether he played at 12 or 13? I have a funny feeling that PW may have moved to 13 although I honestly can't remember.