Absolutely correct, the internet obviously is as good an aid for terrorists as it is for me & you, frankly I'm happy my financial transactions are encrypted, there are more fraudsters than terrorists about.mikerob wrote:As I mentioned, a lot of the anti-terror legislation has been for the politicians to give the illusion they are doing something.
Calls to prevent encryption on the internet, or mass surveillance of the internet also show how clueless the politicians are and these fall into the "something must be done and this is something..." category.
I think it is much easier to see something useful being achieved through stopping Tory cuts to security services rather than idiots who know no more than me about the internet posturing for their own aims.
Frankly, I'd like to see May resign before Thursday for her disgraceful short-sighted slashing of numbers in all aspects of security. She would prefer we blame the guys who saw nothing concrete to prove that Khuram Butt an active threat rather than just a mouthpiece.
Furthermore and finally, for now, many have thought that utter gobshite Donald Trump should not be accorded a Royal Visit and with his disgraceful attack on Sadiq Khan, on the back of his equally disgraceful decision on the Paris Accord, it's time that the invite was withdrawn.
To hell with the excuse that he is the POTUS & head of our dearest allies, the man is a wing-nutbastard who should be barred from entry until he learns a few manners, he was a bully at school, he is still a bully. Attacking Khan, for an 18-month-old grudge, when blood had still not dried on the streets of London is a step too far for me. Orangebastard. I know May is a woman but surely she must have some balls.